Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 38. Núm. 4.
Páginas 371-372 (Outubro - Dezembro 2016)
Compartilhar
Compartilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 38. Núm. 4.
Páginas 371-372 (Outubro - Dezembro 2016)
Erratum
Open Access
Erratum to “Frequencies of polymorphisms of Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy and Diego systems of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil” [Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016;38(3):199–205]
Visitas
604
Daiane Cobianchi Costaa, Alessandra Arruda Schinaidera, Thais Mattos Santosa, Everaldo José Schörnerb, Daniel Simonc, Sharbel Weidner Malufa, Ana Carolina Rabello de Moraesa, Maria Claudia Silva Silvaa,
Autor para correspondência
maria.claudia.silva@ufsc.br

Corresponding author at: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, Campus Trindade, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
a Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
b Hemocentro de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
c Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil
Conteúdo relacionado
Daiane Cobianchi Costa, Alessandra Arruda Schinaider, Thais Mattos Santos, Everaldo José Schörner, Daniel Simon, Sharbel Weidner Maluf, Ana Carolina Rabello de Moraes, Maria Claudia Silva Silva
Este item recebeu

Under a Creative Commons license
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Tabelas (4)
Mostrar maisMostrar menos
Texto Completo

Please consider the following correction:

Results

Page 201 – “Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01, JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo” should read as “Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*02, JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo.”

Page 201 – “When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02 JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)” should read as “When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01, JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)”.

Tables

Table 1 should read as:

System  Genotype  Frequency (n(%))
    373 donors  31 patients 
Duffy  FY*01/FY*01  57 (15.3)  3 (9.7) 
  FY*01/FY*02  176 (47.2)  11 (35.5) 

Table 2 should read as:

Genotype  JOA
N33 
Rh System
RHCE*Ee  0.12 (4) 
RHCE*ee  0.82 (27) 
RHCE*E  0.12 
RHCE*e  0.88 

Table 3 should read as:

Genotype  SC
N373 
PR
N400 
SP-POP1
N948 
SP-POP2
N250 
SP-POP3
N308 
Duffy System
FY*01/FY*01  0.15 (57)  0.12 (50)  0.12 (114)  0.14 (34)  0.12 (36) 
FY*01/FY*02  0.47 (176)  0.40 (157)*  0.45 (426)  0.27 (68)*  0.34 (105)* 

Table 4 should read as:

Genotype  SC
N373 
Austria27
N200 
Naples28
N225 
Zurich29
N4000 
Duffy System
FY*01/FY*01  0.15 (57)  0.20 (40)  0.18 (40)  0.18 (703) 
FY*01/FY*02  0.47 (176)  0.36 (72)*  0.43 (98)  0.47 (1862) 

Copyright © 2016. Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas