Please consider the following correction:
ResultsPage 201 – “Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01, JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo” should read as “Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*02, JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo.”
Page 201 – “When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02 JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)” should read as “When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01, JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)”.
Tables
Table 1 should read as:
Table 2 should read as:
Table 3 should read as:
Table 4 should read as: