Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 44. Núm. S2.
Páginas S299 (Outubro 2022)
Compartilhar
Compartilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 44. Núm. S2.
Páginas S299 (Outubro 2022)
Open Access
GRANULOCYTE-COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR (G-CSF) ENHANCES THE MOBILIZATION OF BONE MARROW-DERIVED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS IN THE PERIPHERAL BLOOD OF BALB/C MICE
Visitas
495
FS Silvaa,b, F Magalhães-Gamab,c, WLL Nevesb, NP Garciab, HNS Ibiapinab, AM Tarragôb,d, EB Leona, AG Costaa,b,d, A Malheiroa,b,d, ND Araújoa,b
a Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, AM, Brazil
b Fundação Hospitalar de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Amazonas (HEMOAM), Manaus, AM, Brazil
c Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
d Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (UEA), Manaus, Brazil
Este item recebeu

Under a Creative Commons license
Informação do artigo
Suplemento especial
Este artigo faz parte de:
Vol. 44. Núm S2
Mais dados
Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged in recent years as beneficial tools for cell therapy and autologous/allogeneic transplantation and their clinical harnessing considers the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB). However, this requires a process of endogenous mobilization that offers a non-invasive alternative. Thus, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and AMD3100 (Plerixafor®) are well known and clinically approved to stimulate MSCs mobilization, but data on their potential activity in MSCs mobilization are still scarce.

Objective

Evaluate the influence of G-CSF and AMD3100 stimulation on MSCs mobilization from BM to PB in BALB/c mice.

Material and methods

For this study, 45 male BALB/c mice aged 3-4 weeks were used. They were divided into 5 groups: PBS+PBS control group (CG, n = 9), PBS+GCSF group (n = 9), PBS+AMD3100 group (n = 9), G-CSF+PBS group (n = 9) and G-CSF+AMD3100 group (n = 9). Pre-treatment was performed with intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 160 μl/i.p.) or G-CSF (200 μg/kg/i.p.) for 4 consecutive days. On day 5 (D5), 24 hours after the last injection of PBS or G-CSF, mice were also injected with PBS or AMD3100 (5 mg/kg/i.p.). After 1 hour, BM and PB samples were subsequently collected. The mobilized CD14+CD73+CD90+CD105+ MSCs were then evaluated ex vivo using Flow Cytometry. Statistical analyzes were performed through GraphPad Prism (v.5) using One-way ANOVA test with Tukey's post-test.

Results and discussion

Based on this study, it was found that there were no statistically significant differences for MSCs mobilization in the BM in any of the studied groups; however, the PBS+AMD3100 group had the highest rate of MSCs enrichment within the BM. Notably, mice of the G-CSF+PBS group exhibited the highest rate of MSCs mobilization in the PB when compared to the CG (p < 0.0001), while the G-CSF+AMD3100 group showed no statistically significant difference for MSCs mobilization in PB. Furthermore, the mice of the PBS+G-CSF group and the PBS+AMD3100 group did not exhibit a significant increase in MSCs mobilization in the PB.

Conclusion

With these results, it is verified that the pre-treatment with G-CSF is the most suitable to induce the MSCs mobilization to PB in a dose-dependent manner. Our data demonstrated that AMD3100 proved not to be suitable for MSCs mobilization in both BM and PB.

Funding

FAPEAM, CAPES and CNPq.

O texto completo está disponível em PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas