Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue S2.
Pages S316 (October 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 44. Issue S2.
Pages S316 (October 2022)
Open Access
TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS MANAGEMENT AFTER ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR PH+ ALL: LESSONS FROM A PEDIATRIC CHALLENGING CASE
Visits
403
AH Melgaçoa, RCBS Tavaresa, LBA Limab, MT Schrammb, PRCB Horna, SC Maradeia, BE Gomesc, LM Gutiyamac, D Lernera, TS Fernandezc
a Centro de Transplante de Medula Óssea (CEMO), Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
b Departamento de Hematologia, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
c Divisão de Laboratório, Centro de Transplante de Medula Óssea (CEMO), Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 44. Issue S2
More info
Introduction

Philadelphia chromosome is found in less than 5% of pediatric but in more than 20% of adults patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) lead to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of these patients, who now have the same stem cell transplantation (SCT) indications as other ALL patients. Recommendations regarding the choice between prophylactic or preemptive strategy, duration of use and the best type of TKI post-SCT need to be better defined.

Objectives

Here we aimed to report a Ph+ ALL pediatric case and to discuss TKI management after SCT.

Case report

An 9-year-old boy, diagnosed with hyperleukocytic Ph+ B-ALL,mutated IKZF1 and negative CNS was treated according to EsPhALL 2010 protocol. He was poor steroid responder on D8, started imatinib on D14, had 30% of blasts on D15 and 0,4% on D33, persistent positive MRD 0.14% by flow cytometry on week 12. Thus, he was classified as high risk, with allogeneic SCT indication in first remission. He received a 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated SCT from an ABO compatible, male, cytomegalovirus positive donor, with cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation and thymoglobulin for conditioning and cyclosporine plus methotrexatefor graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Prophylatic imatinib (100 mg/day) started on D+63 post-SCT. Nevertheless, molecular relapse occurred on D+170. Imatinib was replaced by dasatinib (60 mg/day) and he received three donor lymphocytes infusions (DLI), achieving molecular remission. Due to the occurrence of hematochezia and cytopenias a short suspension and subsequent dose reduction of dasatinib was necessary, after that, he tolerated well 20 mg/day for seven months. After three negative MRD, dasatinib was suspended. Ten months after dasatinib withdrawal, he had an isolated hematological relapse (51% of blasts), at two years post-SCT. He received dexamethasone and dasatinib for cytoreduction followed by IntReALL protocol with hematological remission, but MRD remained positive. Dasatinib was maintained without complications. He received two cycles of blinatumomab, achieving molecular remission. He underwent a second SCT with haploidentical donor in third complete remission. However, he developed severe hepatic venoocclusive disease (VOD) and died on D+48.

Discussion

Several issues related to the TKI usage post-SCT for Ph+ ALL has to be elucidate. The EBMT recommendation of prophylactic imatinib use after SCT,was based on lower relapse rate and better survival reported by a retrospective study in adults patients with imatinib. More recently, a systematic review showed that both prophylactic and preemptive TKIs approaches post-SCT improved survival of patients in CR1 before transplant. Thus, the choice ofpreemptiveuse of TKIs seems to be reasonable, since is less toxic and less immunosuppressive; however, it require a more frequent MRD monitoring by flow cytometry or IgH/TCR PCR and TKIs maintenance until at least one year after MRD negativity.

Conclusion

: Our case illustrates the efficacy of dasatinib preemptive associated with DLI in inducing molecular remission. However, it points out that, in addition to the extension of the marrow MRD monitoring period, the duration of TKI use to guarantee the persistence of molecular remission can be long, for more than one year since MRD negativity.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools