Journal Information
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S458 (October 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S458 (October 2023)
Full text access
HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH HEMOPHILIA A OR B WITH INHIBITORS ON CONCIZUMAB PROPHYLAXIS: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE 3 EXPLORER7 STUDY
Visits
225
AD Shapiroa, A Abrahamb, S Linaric, JS Neergaardd, J Odgaard-Jensend, JJT Zawd, H Trane, GG Fabbronf
a Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center, Indianapolis, United States
b Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
c Center for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
d Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
e Haemophilia Treatment Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
f Novo Nordisk Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 45. Issue S4

HEMO 2023

More info
Introduction

Concizumab is a humanised, monoclonal anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibody. In explorer7, a phase 3 study (NCT04083781), patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI) received once-daily subcutaneous prophylactic treatment with concizumab for prevention of bleeding episodes. Here, we present data on patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after concizumab treatment for 24 weeks in explorer7. Methods: Male patients aged ≥12 years (n = 133) were randomised to no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab (arm 2) or assigned to non-randomised concizumab arms (arms 3 or 4). All patients could complete the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) and patients ≥17 years could complete the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 16 and 24. SF-36v2 health scales “bodily pain” (BP) and “physical functioning”(PF) were analysed as key secondary endpoints. Several patient-reported outcomes recordings were not collected due to technical reasons. Therefore, a post-hoc mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis. The MMRM analysis included patients from arms 1 and 2 completing the questionnaire at baseline and at least once on the new dosing regimen.

Results

The estimated treatment difference (ETD) on the SF-36v2 BP scale between arm 1 (n = 9) and arm 2 (concizumab, n = 23) from baseline to Week 24 was 7.0 points (95% CI: -1.6; 15.6). On the PF scale, the ETD was 3.3 points (95% CI: -3.8; 10.4). While BP and PF scores were not significantly different between both arms, the scales “general health”, “mental health”, “role-emotional”and “vitality”showed statistically significant differences in favour of concizumab. The total Haem-A-QoL score was significantly improved in arm 2 (n = 13) compared to arm 1 (n = 4, ETD: -22.6 points [95% CI: -42.5; -2.7]). Significant differences were observed for the domains “feeling”, “treatment”, “view of yourself”, and “sport and leisure”. Discussion/Conclusion: Patients on daily subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis reported better scores on generic (SF-36v2) and disease-specific (Haem-A-QoL) questionnaires compared to patients treated on-demand. The largest ETDs were related to mental and general health. This reflects the potential of concizumab prophylaxis to improve HRQoL in patients with HAwI/HBwI.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools