Journal Information
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S406-S407 (October 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S406-S407 (October 2023)
Full text access
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ELRANATAMAB BY AGE AND FRAILTY IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A SUBGROUP ANALYSIS FROM MAGNETISMM-3
Visits
278
N Rajea, X Leleub, A Lesokhinc, M Mohtyd, A Nookae, E Leipf, U Conteg, A Viqueirah, V Blunki, S Manierj
a Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
b Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
c Division of Hematology and Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
d Sorbonne University, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, and INSERM UMRs938, Paris, France
e Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, United States
f Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
g Pfizer Inc, New York, United States
h Pfizer SLU, Madrid, Spain
i Pfizer, São Paulo, Brazil
j Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 45. Issue S4

HEMO 2023

More info
Introduction/Objectives

Multiple myeloma is a disease of elderly and frail people, who are often predominantly ineligible for intensive therapies. The objective of this analysis is to report the efficacy and safety of elranatamab monotherapy by age and frailty in B-cell maturation antigen-naïve patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) enrolled into cohort A of the ongoing phase 2 MagnetisMM -3 (NCT04649359) study.

Materials and methods

Eligibility criteria, dosing and administration were previously reported (Bahlis et al, ASH 2022). Subgroups of pts within Cohort A (n = 123) were analyzed by age: <65 (n = 43) vs ≥65 years (n = 80) and frailty: non-frail (n = 84) vs frail (n = 39). A simplified frailty scale was used (Facon et al, Leukemia 2020). Results include data up through ≍12 months after last pt initial dose.

Results

The median treatment duration was 8.2 vs 5.5 mo in the <65 vs ≥65 years, and 6.4 vs 5.6 mo in the non-frail and frail subgroups, respectively. Discontinuation occurred in 62.8% vs 67.5% of pts aged <65 vs ≥65 years and in 63.1% vs 71.8% of the non-frail vs frail groups, respectively. The most common reason for discontinuation in all subgroups was progressive disease, 51.2%, 32.5%, 42.9%, and 30.8% of <65, ≥65 years, non-frail, and frail subgroups, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) (95% CI) was 58.1% (42.1%, 73.0%) vs 62.5% (51.0%, 73.1%) for pts aged <65 vs ≥65 years. Median duration of response was not reached in either age subgroup. The probability of maintaining response (95% CI) at 12 mo was 74.1% (51.0%, 87.5%) vs 73.8% (55.7%, 85.4%) for pts aged <65 vs ≥65 years. The ORR (95% CI) for non-frail pts was 63.1% (51.9%, 73.4%) vs 56.4% (39.6%, 72.2%) for frail pts. Median duration of response was not reached in either frailty subgroup. The probability of maintaining response at 12 mo (95% CI) was 76.0% (60.2%, 86.2%) vs 70.5% (41.9%, 86.9%) for non-frail vs frail pts. Any grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 100% of pts in the study. Grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported in 74.4%, 68.8%, 73.8% and 64.1% of pts in <65, ≥65, non-frail and frail subgroups, respectively. Infections (any grade; grade 3/4; grade 5) were reported in 72.1%, 32.6% and 4.7% vs 68.8%, 40.0% and 6.3% in <65 and ≥65 pts, respectively, and in 70.2%, 38.1% and 4.8% vs 69.2%, 35.9% and 7.7% in non-frail and frail pts, respectively. The rate of cytokine release syndrome was similar in patients with respect to age (<65, 58.1%; ≥65 years, 57.5%) and frailty groups (non-frail, 57.1%; frail, 59.0%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in 2.3%, 6.3%, 6.0% and 2.6% of pts in <65, ≥65, non-frail and frail subgroups, respectively.

Discussion

Elranatamab is efficacious and has a manageable safety profile in elderly or frail pts with RRMM.

Conclusions

Elranatamab may be a treatment option for those ineligible for more intensive myeloma therapies.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools