Journal Information
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S405 (October 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S405 (October 2023)
Full text access
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ELRANATAMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PRIOR B-CELL MATURATION ANTIGEN–DIRECTED THERAPIES: A POOLED ANALYSIS FROM MAGNETISMM STUDIES
Visits
252
A Nookaa, A Lesokhinb, M Mohtyc, R Niesvizkyd, C Maisele, B Arnulff, S Larsong, A Varshavsky-Yanovskyh, X Leleui, L Karlinj, D Vesolek, N Bahlisl, CF Larream, N Rajen, E Leipo, U Contep, M Elmeliegyq, A Viqueirar, V Blunks, S Maniert
a Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, United States
b Division of Hematology and Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
c Sorbonne University, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, and INSERM UMRs938, Paris, France
d Weill Cornell Medical College – New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, United States
e Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, United States
f Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
g University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States
h Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
i Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
j Centre Hospitalier Lyon, Lyon, France
k John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, United States
l Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
m Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
n Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
o Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
p Pfizer Inc, New York, United States
q Pfizer Inc, San Diego, United States
r Pfizer SLU, Madrid, Spain
s Pfizer, São Paulo, Brazil
t Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 45. Issue S4

HEMO 2023

More info
Introduction/Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elranatamab in a pooled analysis of patients (pts) enrolled in MagnetisMM trials with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had prior exposure to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapy.

Materials and methods

Eligible pts received at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, 1 anti-CD38 antibody, and 1 BCMA-directed therapy (antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] and/or chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cells). The pooled analysis included pts in the MagnetisMM-1 trial (NCT03269136; n = 13) who received subcutaneous (SC) elranatamab 215-1000 μg/kg; MM-3 (NCT04649359; n = 64) and MM-9 (NCT05014412; n = 9) who received the recommended phase 2 dose of 76 mg SC once-weekly. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated by investigator per IMWG criteria. TEAEs were graded by CTCAE (MM-1, v4.03; MM-3 & MM-9, v5.0); CRS and ICANS were graded by ASTCT criteria. Results include data up through ≍10 months after last pt initial dose in all pooled studies.

Results

In total, 86 pts were included. Median age was 66.0 y (range, 40-84); 47.7% male. At baseline, 69.8% had an ECOG PS ≥1; 24.4% had high risk cytogenetics; 54.7% had extramedullary disease. Pts received a median of 7.0 (3-19) prior lines of therapy, including BCMA-directed ADC (67.4%), CAR T-cells (41.9%); 9.3% received both. 96.5% and 54.7% of pts were triple-class and penta-drug refractory, respectively; among pts who received ADC and CAR-T cells respectively, 79.3% and 27.8% were refractory to ADC and CAR-T cells. After a median follow-up of 10.3 mo (0.3-32.3), median duration of treatment was 3.3 mo (0.03-30.4). At the cut-off date, 24.4% of pts remained on treatment; most common reason for permanent treatment discontinuation was progressive disease (44.2%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 45.3% (95% CI 34.6-56.5), with ≥CR achieved in 17.4% of pts. ORR for pts with prior BCMA-directed ADC and CAR-T cells was 41.4% (95% CI 28.6-55.1) and 52.8% (95% CI 35.5-69.6), respectively. Among responders, median time to objective response was 1.9 mo (0.3-9.3). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached by 10 mo; the DOR rate at 9 mo was 72.4% (95% CI 54.7-84.2). DOR rate (95% CI) for pts with prior BCMA-directed ADC and CAR-T cells were 67.3% (43.1-83.0) and 78.9% (53.2-91.5) at 9 mo, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 mo (95% CI 1.9-7.7); median overall survival was not reached by 10 mo, with a rate of 60.1% (95% CI 48.9-69.6) at 9 mo. Most common (≥25% of pts) TEAEs were CRS (65.1% [G3 1.2%]), anemia (59.3% [G3/4, 46.5%]), neutropenia (44.2% [G3/4, 40.7%]), thrombocytopenia (40.7% [G3/4, 29.1%]), diarrhea (33.7% [G3/4, 0%], and lymphopenia (32.6% [G3/4, 30.2%]). 5.8% (G3, 2.3%) of pts.

Discussion

In pts with RRMM and prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapies, elranatamab was efficacious and well tolerated; no new safety signals were observed vs the BCMA-naïve population.

Conclusions

These results support treatment with elranatamab in pts with RRMM post BCMA-directed therapy.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools