Journal Information
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S244 (October 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 45. Issue S4.
HEMO 2023
Pages S244 (October 2023)
Full text access
CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOME OF PATIENTS RECEIVING VENETOCLAX-BASED REGIMENS IN BRAZIL: A REAL-WORLD STUDY
Visits
232
M Dibaia, M Guaranab, RL Baptistac,d, V Mauade, MPQ Netof, AAK Johanng, FB Duarteh, E Nunesi, CS Chiattonej, M Nuccib,k
a Hospital Samaritano, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
b Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
c Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
d Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
e Hospital Brasil, Santo André, Brazil
f Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, Brazil
g Grupo Oncoclínicas, Curitiba, Brazil
h Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio (HUWC), Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brazil
i Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil
j Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil
k Grupo Oncoclínicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 45. Issue S4

HEMO 2023

More info
Introduction

The combination of venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (VEM-HM) is considered standard of care for unfit or elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, in the real world, venetoclax-based regimens have been used also to treat fit patients with AML, relapsed/refractory AML, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Objective

To describe the early results of a multicentric study that evaluated patients with AML or MDS treated with venetoclax-based regimens in Brazil.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we evaluated clinical characteristics, complications and outcome of the first cycle of venetoclax-based regimens in the treatment of patients with AML and MDS.

Results

A total of 64 patients were analyzed, 58% were male and the median age was 64 years (range 19-82). Most patients had AML (88%) with high risk disease (64%), and the main indication for venetoclax use was unfit patient (51%). VEN-HM was the most common regimen used (74%), while intensive chemotherapy regimens plus venetoclax was given in 10 patients. The most common symptoms were nausea (45%) and diarrhea (39%). Mucositis occurred in all patients receiving intensive chemotherapy vs. 20% in patients receiving VEN-HM (p < 0.001). Antifungal prophylaxis was used in 67.5% of patients, and micafungin was the most frequent agent (70%). Antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis was used in 53% each. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 82% of patients, with 47% classified as fever of unknown origin, 15% bacteremia, 22% clinically docummented and 15% microbiologically documented infection. Proven or probable invasive fungal disease (IFD) was diagnosed in 1 of 10 (10%) patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and 3 of 43 (7.0%) receiving VEN-HM: aspergillosis in 1, fusariosis in 2 and invasive candidiasis in 1. At the end of the first cycle, 52% of patients had complete response (CR) or complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and 34% were considered refractory. CR + CRi was 57.5% in patients receiving VEN-HM and 30% in patients receiving intensive regimens. Death occurred in 6% of patients.

Discussion

This is the first real-world study in Brazil evaluating the use o venetoclax-based regimens in patients with AML or MDS. These preliminary results show that a) antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral prophylaxis are a common practice; b) most clinicians chose an echinocandin, probabily to avoid venetoclax dose reduction; c) The 52% CR + CRi rate after the first cycle is similar to the rates observed in the randomized trial.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools