Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue S2.
Pages S75 (October 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 44. Issue S2.
Pages S75 (October 2022)
Open Access
ANTI-HNA-3 ANTIBODIES IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT REJECTION: IS IT AN IMMUNOLOGICAL RISK FACTOR?
Visits
632
JO Martinsa, E Moritza, AJ Saluma, R Marcob, JOMA Pestanac, HTS Juniorc, MG Limab, JO Bordina
a Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b Instituto de Imunogenética (IGEN), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
c Hospital do Rim (HRim), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 44. Issue S2
More info
Introduction

Human neutrophil antigens 3 (HNA-3a and HNA-3b) are located on choline transporter protein 2 (CTL2) and expressed on neutrophils, lungs, kidneys and other human tissues. Alloantibodies directed against these antigens are formed from allogeneic exposure and are mainly associated with transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and immune neutropenias, however due to the presence of this antigen in renal tissue and the doubt that HNA-3 alloimmunization may also be involved in cases of kidney transplant rejection, the study of the frequency of anti-HNA-3 antibodies in this context becomes a focus of great clinical relevance.

Objective

Investigate the presence of anti-HNA-3 antibodies in the serum of patients who had kidney transplant rejection.

Materials and methods

A total of 604 patients with kidney transplant rejection were included in the study. The Granulocyte Agglutination Test (GAT) was performed as a screening test in all individuals included in the present study with a panel of granulocytes from at least three individuals previously genotyped for all HNA systems. Positive samples in GAT were tested using the microsphere-based technique (LABSCreen Multi kit, One Lambda); we analyzed the normalized background values ≥ 10 and immunofluorescence ≥ 1000 as a positive result for HNA-3 antibodies. HNA-3 genotyping by PCR-RFLP was performed only in individuals who had a positive result in serological techniques.

Results

We detected 85/604 (14.1%) positive samples in GAT and 11/85 positive samples in both GAT and LSM multi for anti-HNA antibodies. Regarding the specificity of these 11 samples, 6 (54.5%) individuals presented an anti-HNA-3b antibody confirmed by genotyping (HNA- 3a/HNA-3a). In addition to the anti-HNA-3b antibodies, other specificities of anti-HNA antibodies were also identified: 1/11 (9.1%) anti-HNA-1a, 2/11 (18.2%) anti-HNA-1b, 1/11 (9.1%) anti-HNA-FCγRIIIb and 1/11 (9.1%) anti-HNA-2. Furthermore, 14/85 (16.5%) individuals had anti-HLA antibodies detected by LSM multi: 8/14 (57.1%) class I, 3/14 (21.4%) class II and 3/14 (21.4) class I and II. No patient presented simultaneously anti-HNA and HLA antibodies.

Conclusion

Our data show that HNA-3b alloimmunization is significantly high in patients who rejected kidney transplantation compared to healthy blood donors (1.0% vs. 0.2% respectively, p = 0.05). These findings indicate that the detection of anti-HNA-3b antibodies may allow a better understanding of patients’ immune response against renal allograft when no HLA antibody is identified supporting evidence of immunological risk.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools