Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 47. Núm. S3.
HEMO 2025 / III Simpósio Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo
(Outubro 2025)
Vol. 47. Núm. S3.
HEMO 2025 / III Simpósio Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo
(Outubro 2025)
ID - 1866
Acesso de texto completo
INFLAMMATORY INDICES AS INDICATORS OF IMMUNE ACTIVATION AND THROMBOTIC RISK IN PHILADELPHIA-NEGATIVE MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS
Visitas
25
PP Satera, VL Bassana, LMG Ramosa, LFF Tuccia, LLdF Pontesb, FA de Castroa, CM Marzocchi-Machadoa
a Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto (FCFRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
b Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Resume
Texto Completo
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Suplemento especial
Este artigo faz parte de:
Vol. 47. Núm S3

HEMO 2025 / III Simpósio Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo

Mais dados
Introduction

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic disorders characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells, chronic inflammation, and an increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Hemogram-derived indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) have been investigated as accessible, non-invasive tools to assess the inflammatory status and thrombotic risk stratification in various diseases, including MPNs. However, clinical data supporting their application in this context remain limited.

Objectives

To evaluate the inflammatory indices NLR, PLR, and SII in patients with MPNs compared to healthy controls, and to discuss their relevance as potential biomarkers of systemic inflammation and immune activation in these patients.

Material and methods

Retrospective data from 16 patients with MPNs and 16 healthy individuals were analyzed. Inflammatory indices were calculated using absolute counts of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets. NLR, PLR, and SII values were compared between groups, with emphasis on patients presenting the most significant alterations. This study was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001.

Results

MPN patients showed significantly higher inflammatory indices compared to healthy controls. NLR values above 2.0 (p = 0.0088) and PLR values above 200 (p = 0.0136) indicate marked immune activation, a characteristic feature in these patients. Although the SII—which integrates platelet and neutrophil counts relative to lymphocyte count—was also elevated, it showed greater inter-individual variability (p = 0.0014). The integrated interpretation of these indices reinforces the presence of systemic inflammation and a potential increased thrombotic risk in MPN patients.

Discussion and conclusion

NLR, PLR, and SII have emerged as predictors of adverse outcomes in malignancies and cardiovascular diseases. In the context of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), chronic inflammation plays a central role in disease pathogenesis and contributes to endothelial activation, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, and other hematologic alterations that promote thrombosis. Evaluating these indices, which are easily derived from routine complete blood counts, offers a practical, low-cost approach with promising clinical utility. Despite being still underutilized, these markers may assist in the early identification of patients at increased thromboinflammatory risk, enabling the timely implementation of antithrombotic prophylaxis. Taken together, the significant elevation of NLR, PLR, and SII in MPN patients supports their potential use as complementary biomarkers for assessing systemic inflammation and stratifying thrombotic risk in this chronically inflamed population. However, further large-scale studies are warranted to validate their applicability and support their incorporation into clinical decision-making processes.

Texto Completo

References:

Duygulu ME, Ayyildiz T, Yildirim B, et al. Evaluation of coagulation parameters in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Niger J Clin Pract. 2024;27(1):89-94. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_659_22. PMID: 38373166.

Ersal T, Özkocaman V, Pınar İE, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Rep. 2023;13:12539. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39648-4. PMID: 37500346; PMCID: PMC10369454.

Hu C, Zhao B, Ye Q, et al. Nomogram to predict early death in acute promyelocytic leukemia based on real-world data. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023;29:10760296231187392. doi:10.1177/10760296231187392. PMID: 37495188; PMCID: PMC10370054.

Koschmieder S, Chatain N. Role of inflammation in the biology of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood Rev. 2020;42:100711. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2019.100711. PMID: 31959365.

Kosidło JW, Wolszczak-Biedrzycka B, Matowicka-Karna J, et al. Inflammatory markers in hematologic malignancies: clinical implications. J Inflamm Res. 2023;16:539-62. doi:10.2147/JIR.S395318. PMID: 36711416; PMCID: PMC9876803.

Krecak I, Lekovic D, Arsenovic I, et al. Prognostic impact of molecular and clinical features in chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Med. 2024;13:4459. doi:10.3390/jcm13214459. PMID: 38200671; PMCID: PMC10887734.

Baixar PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas