Background: Long-term clinical benefit has been demonstrated in people with hemophilia A following a single administration of the investigational gene therapy valoctocogene roxaparvovec (AAV5-hFVIII-SQ). Safety, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms of episomal vector DNA persistence have been previously described, but outstanding questions pertain to the maintenance of these attributes over increasing durations of follow-up. Aims: The four-year safety, efficacy, and durability of valoctocogene roxaparvovec is evaluated in a Phase 1/2 clinical study for severe hemophilia A. Methods: Adult male study participants with severe hemophilia A were followed for up to four years after receiving a single intravenous dose of valoctocogene roxaparvovec at 6×1013 vg/kg (n=7) or 4×1013 vg/kg (n=6). Results: After four (6×1013 vg/kg) or three (4×1013 vg/kg) years, all study participants demonstrated clinically meaningful FVIII activity levels with reductions in bleeds and FVIII usage. Following withdrawal from prophylaxis, annualized bleeding rate declined from pre-treatment mean by 95% at year four in 6×1013 vg/kg participants, and 93% at year three in 4×1013 vg/kg participants. Despite FVIII activity levels continuing to decline at a shallow rate, all patients in both cohorts remained off prophylaxis. After four years, the safety profile of valoctocogene roxaparvovec remained favorable and unchanged, with no inhibitor development or treatment-related ALT elevations beyond year one. Conclusions: Four-year follow-up data demonstrate that gene transfer with valoctocogene roxaparvovec leads to substantial and sustained FVIII activity levels, clinically relevant reductions in self-reported bleeding episodes, and significant reductions in FVIII replacement infusions. These data from the first-in-human trial represent the most up-to-date, long term follow-up data currently available for the investigational use of AAV-mediated therapy for hemophilia A.
O fator de impacto mede o número médio de citações recebidas em um ano por trabalhos publicados na revista durante os dois anos anteriores.
© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2025
O CiteScore mede as citações médias recebidas por documento publicado. Mais informação
Ver maisSJR é uma métrica de prestígio baseada na idéia de que todas as citações não são iguais. SJR utiliza um algoritmo similar ao page rank do Google; é uma medida quantitativa e qualitativa ao impacto de uma publicação.
Ver maisSNIP permite comparar o impacto de revistas de diferentes campos temáticos, corrigindo as diferenças na probabilidade de ser citado que existe entre revistas de distintas matérias.
Ver maisThe median number of days it takes for an article to go from submission to first editorial decision.
Ver mais



