Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 46. Núm. 4.
Páginas 572-574 (outubro - dezembro 2024)
Vol. 46. Núm. 4.
Páginas 572-574 (outubro - dezembro 2024)
Letter to the Editor
Acesso de texto completo
Association between time of heparin exposure and platelets decline in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia
Visitas
1803
Omid Moradi Moghaddama,b, Zohreh Heydari Ramshehb, Mohsen Sedighia, Alireza Amanollahia, Mohammad Niakan Lahijia,b,
Autor para correspondência
niyakanlahiji.m@iums.ac.ir

Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
a Trauma and Injury Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
b School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Bibliografia
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Figuras (1)
Tabelas (2)
Table 1. Demographic and clinical data of ICU patients in two groups of study (n = 99).
Tabelas
Table 2. Complete blood count components of positive PF4 patients during heparin therapy in ICUs.
Tabelas
Mostrar maisMostrar menos
Texto Completo

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-based side effect of heparin due tothe formation of platelet-activating antibodies, which target platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4/H) complexes and results in thrombocytopenia.1 HIT is typified by a decline in platelet counts that typically occurs within 5 to 14 days after the initiation of heparin therapy and diagnosed based on the evaluation of clinical presentation through a validated pretest probability score, known as the 4Ts score, in combination with PF4/H antibodies corroboration which is a laboratory antigen assay.2 Furthermore, HIT is usually seen patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) and less common with low–molecular weight heparin (LMWH). In this letter, we presented longitudinal changes in the complete blood count (CBC) of confirmed HIT patients in the intensive care units (ICUs).3

This retrospective study was conducted on ICU patients receiving heparin at Rasoul Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Patients with clinical suspicion of HIT were included if they had available PF4 test results and 4Ts score.4 Also, individuals with preexisting heparin allergy or history of coagulopathy, autoimmune disease, and pancytopenia were excluded from the study. Linear mixed model (LMM) was used to assess longitudinal changes in mean CBC components including platelet, hemoglobin, and white blood cell (WBC).

A total of 99 suspected HIT patients were enrolled in the study and divided into positive (n = 35) and negative (n = 64) groups for PF4 antibody (Table 1). A significant difference was observed in the treatment service of patients between positive and negative PF4 groups (p = 0.025), and the total 4T score for positive PF4 group was notably higher than negative PF4 (p = 0.001). Moreover, 88.6 % of positive PF4 patients were high risk for HIT whereas 68.8 % of negative PF4 were intermediate (p = 0.001). Mean platelets showed a significant decrease in positive PF4 patients for both genders (p = 0.001) over the time of heparin therapy (3rd, 5th, 7th day) while changes in mean hemoglobin level and WBC were not significant (Table 2). Figure 1 represents changes in mean platelets for different genders (Figure 1A) and treatment services (Figure 1B) during heparin therapy in positive PF4 patients.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data of ICU patients in two groups of study (n = 99).

Patients’ variables  Positive PF4 (n = 35)  Negative PF4 (n = 64)  P value 
Age (year)a  63.94±17.51  64.06±17.80  0.974 
Gender (n,%)b       
Male  19 (54.3)  41 (64.1)  0.341 
Female  16 (45.7)  23 (35.9)   
Treatment service (n,%)b       
Internal patients  16 (45.7)  44 (68.7)  0.025 
Surgical patients  19 (54.3)  20 (31.3)   
Type of heparin (n,%)b       
UHF  33 (94.3)  57 (89.1)  0.387 
LMWH  2 (5.7)  7 (10.9)   
Indication for heparin (n,%)b       
Treatment  16 (45.7)  20 (31.3)  0.153 
Prophylaxis  19 (54.3)  44 (68.8)   
Comorbidities (n,%)b       
Hypertension  21 (60)  27 (42.2)  0.090 
Valvular heart disease  1 (2.9)  1 (1.6)  0.662 
Atrial fibrillation  4 (11.4)  5 (24)  0.550 
Ischemic heart disease  14 (40)  29 (45.3)  0.610 
Hear failure  4 (11.4)  9 (14.1)  0.711 
Diabetes  6 (17.1)  21 (32.8)  0.094 
Stroke  5 (14.3)  9 (14.1)  0.976 
Chronic kidney disease  4 (11.4)  17 (26.6)  0.078 
COPD  5 (14.3)  7 (10.9)  0.626 
Deep vein thrombosis  3 (8.6)  6 (9.4)  0.894 
Pulmonary embolism  6 (17.1)  3 (4.7)  0.039 
Cancer  5 (14.3)  10 (15.6)  0.859 
APACHE II score a  7.02±15.43  4.47±11.85  0.361 
SOFA score a  8.74±1.26  9.03±1.39  0.312 
Total 4T score  6.31 ± 0.71  4.67±1.00  0.001 
Low risk (n,%)  8 (12.5)   
Intermediate risk (n,%)  4 (11.4)  44 (68.8)  0.001 
High risk (n,%)  31 (88.6)  12 (18.7)   

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; PF4, platelet factor 4; UHF, unfractionated heparin; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

a

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

b

Categorical data are presented as frequency (%).

Table 2.

Complete blood count components of positive PF4 patients during heparin therapy in ICUs.

Variables*GenderDuration of heparin therapyp value
1 day  3 day  5 day  7 day 
PlateletsMale  241.89±91.10  173.47±84.46  122.42±69.94  103.0 ± 45.86  0.001 
Female  206.44±105.60  141.0 ± 69.69  123.25±56.67  113.46±59.18  0.001 
HemoglobinMale  11.63±3.54  10.30±2.74  11.13±2.30  10.62±3.17  0.541 
Female  11.10±2.29  10.86±1.39  9.88±1.19  10.06±1.98  0.156 
WBCMale  11.46±5.08  10.62±3.61  9.21±3.61  8.76±3.65  0.147 
Female  10.71±3.39  11.66±3.49  11.31±3.85  10.80±4.34  0.650 

Abbreviations: PF4, platelet factor 4; ICU, intensive care unit; WBC, weight blood cell.

Continues data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 1.

Changes in mean platelets estimated by linear mixed model (LMM) analysis based on treatment services (1A) and gender (1B) during heparin therapy in confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) patients with positive platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4-H) antibody (*reference: first day).

(0.19MB).

Age, gender, treatment service, and duration of heparin therapy were considered as covariates in LMM analysis to find their effects on longitudinal changes in CBC components. Our results showed that changes in mean platelets in surgical patients were remarkably greater than in internal patients (β= −32.6, p = 0.03). Moreover, duration of the patient's exposure to heparin significantly affected longitudinal changes in mean platelets in positive PF4 patients ([3rd day: β= −6.13; p = 0.001], [5th day: β= −97.1; p = 0.001], [7th day: β= −112.2; p = 0.001]). A significant relationship was found between changes in mean hemoglobin and gender (β= −1.7, p = 0.005) and treatment service (β= −1.3, p = 0.04) of positive PF4 patients over the time of heparin therapy. Age of patients did not affect longitudinal changes in CBC components.

The occurrence rate of HIT in patients on heparin is highly variable. HIT is commonly less frequent in patients receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (< 1 %) in comparison with UHF (1–5 %).5 Moreover, females are more prone to develop HIT than males. Consistent with us, the rate of HIT occurrence in surgical ICU patients has been shown to be higher than in medical ICU patients.6 In surgical patients treated with UFH, the risk of HIT is 10 to 15 times higher than in those treated with LMWH. Heparin administration prophylactically runs the risk of antibody formation, while clinical presentations observe more in patients treating with therapeutic doses. Just 5 % to 30 % of cases with the production of HIT IgG antibodies will develop HIT.7 The main causes of thrombocytopenia in HIT patients are major surgical procedures, transfusion reactions, side effects of drugs, and sepsis. It has been recommended that monitoring of thrombotic complications in patients on heparin can be a better indicator of HIT diagnosis than uncomplicated thrombocytopenia.8 In uncomplicated patients with low susceptibility to HIT, administration of heparin should not be stopped and additional laboratory testing is not necessary. But heparin administration should be discontinued and alternative anticoagulation should be initiated in patients with an increased susceptibility to HIT.9

Based on the findings of this study, duration of the patient's exposure to heparin affects significantly magnitude of decline in platelets of patients with PF4/H antibody and may result in discontinuing heparin administration. Also, the degree of platelet decline in surgical HIT patients is notably greater than in internal HIT patients.

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee (IR.IAU.KHUISF.REC.1397.152), and written informed consent was obtained from all individuals.

References
[1]
A. Cuker, D.B Cines.
How I treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Blood, 119 (2012), pp. 2209-2218
[2]
T.E Warkentin.
How I diagnose and manage HIT.
Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2011 (2011), pp. 143-149
[3]
T.E. Warkentin, J.-A.I. Sheppard, C.S. Sigouin, T. Kohlmann, P. Eichler, A Greinacher.
Gender imbalance and risk factor interactions in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Blood, 108 (2006), pp. 2937-2941
[4]
A. Cuker, P.A. Gimotty, M.A. Crowther, T.E Warkentin.
Predictive value of the 4Ts scoring system for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Blood, 120 (2012), pp. 4160-4167
[5]
T.E. Warkentin, R.J. Cook, V.J. Marder, J.-A.I. Sheppard, J.C. Moore, B.I. Eriksson, et al.
Anti–platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in orthopedic surgery patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or enoxaparin.
Blood, 106 (2005), pp. 3791-3796
[6]
L-A Linkins, A.L. Dans, L.K. Moores, R. Bona, B.L. Davidson, S. Schulman, et al.
Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
Chest, 141 (2012), pp. e495S-e530S
[7]
T.E. Warkentin, J.-A.I. Sheppard, J.C. Moore, K.M. Moore, C.S. Sigouin, J.G. Kelton.
Laboratory testing for the antibodies that cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: how much class do we need?.
J Lab Clin Med, 146 (2005), pp. 341-346
[8]
Z.K. Baldwin, A.L. Spitzer, V.L. Ng, A.H. Harken.
Contemporary standards for the diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).
Surgery, 143 (2008), pp. 305-312
[9]
C. Pouplard, P. Gueret, M. Fouassier, C. Ternisien, M. Trossaert, S. Regina, et al.
Prospective evaluation of the ‘4Ts’ score and particle gel immunoassay specific to heparin/PF4 for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
J Thromb Haemost, 5 (2007), pp. 1373-1379
Copyright © 2024. Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
Baixar PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas