Journal Information
Vol. 41. Issue 2.
Pages 153-157 (April - June 2019)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
22588
Vol. 41. Issue 2.
Pages 153-157 (April - June 2019)
Original article
Open Access
Sex-divided reference intervals for mean platelet volume, platelet large cell ratio and plateletcrit using the Sysmex XN-10 automated haematology analyzer in a UK population
Visits
22588
Usman Alia,
Corresponding author
usmanali1@nhs.net

Corresponding author at: Department of Hematology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton Row, London E9 6SR, UK.
, Roz Gibbsb, Gavin Knightb, Dimitris Tsitsikasa
a Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton Row, London, UK
b University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
Related content
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2019;41:104-510.1016/j.htct.2019.04.001
Magnun Nueldo Nunes dos Santos
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Table 1. Comparison of reference intervals for platelet indices, using the Sysmex analytical platforms from 2012 to date.
Table 2. P values, sex-specific means and standard deviations for platelet indices [MPV, PDW, P-LCR, PCT], and the PDW reference interval for total individuals on the Sysmex XN-10 in samples with FBC parameters within the local reference ranges.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Background

This study aimed to define the sex-divided reference intervals for platelet indices (mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR) and plateletcrit (PCT)) on the Sysmex XN-10.

Methods

A total of 2376 samples were assayed for full blood count on the Sysmex XN-10 haematology analyzer. After removing the outliers, reference intervals were calculated using the mean±2SD. The P value 0.05 was adopted to denote statistical significance.

Results

There was a statistical significance (α=0.05) between sex-divided reference intervals for MPV (p=0.007), P-LCR (p=0.015) and PCT (p<0.001), thus separate reference intervals were calculated for these indices, with orientation to the sex-divisions as follows: MPV, 9.1–13.0fL [males] and 9.2–12.8fL [females]; P-LCR, 17.6–47.0% [males] and 17.8–47.8% [females]; and PCT, 0.16–0.35% [males] and 0.18–0.37% [females]. No significance was found between sex-divided reference intervals for the PDW (p=0.838), therefore a reference interval for total individuals was calculated for this platelet measurement as 9.3–17.3fL.

Conclusion

This study showed comparable reference intervals, using the Sysmex XN-10, with the previous literature. It determined the need to define sex-specific reference intervals for the MPV, P-LCR and PCT, but not for the PDW. These reference intervals will allow for low and high values to be facilitated in order to do further research and guide platelet disorder management.

Keywords:
Reference values
Blood platelet
Mean platelet volume
Blood cell count
Hematologic tests
Full Text
Introduction

The introduction of automated clinical haematology analyzers has enabled accurate, precise and high throughput performance1 and has made new parameters available which had hitherto been undetermined.2 The latest generation of automated haematology analyzers, the Sysmex XN-10, is widely used in several clinical laboratories in the UK and can determine a vast array of novel and innovative platelet indices determined together in an automatic full blood count (FBC) profile over and above the platelet count. These platelet indices are related to morphology and thrombopoiesis3 and include the mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distributing width (PDW), platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR) and plateletcrit (PCT).4

The MPV is the measure of thrombocyte volume, which is analyzer-calculated and usually increases when platelet production is decreased.3 The PDW is an indicator of volume dispersion in platelet size, which increases when platelet anisocytosis is present.5 The P-LCR is an indicator of circulating platelets that are larger than 12fL, and has been used to monitor the activity of platelets.6 The PCT is the platelet-occupied volume reflecting platelet mass and calculated using the formula PCT=plateletcount×MPV/10,000.7–9 The MPV and PDW are reported in femtolitres (fL) while the other two platelet indices, the P-LCR and PCT, are reported as a percentage (%).

The potential diagnostic applications of these indices have broadened beyond the differential diagnosis of platelet disorders. Variations in the MPV and PDW have been associated with cardiovascular, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases,10–12 while the enhanced P-LCR has been particularly useful in relation to antiplatelet antibodies,10–15 and the PCT has been shown to act as a biomarker for determining active Crohn's disease with a cut-off value of 0.28%.16

Despite the relative ease in obtaining these platelet indices, the principle underlying their measurement influences the results and instrument heterogeneity poses a challenge to the comparison of results between analytical platforms.3 Accordingly, there is evidence that reference intervals established by different manufacturers may not be suitable across laboratories and therefore local reference intervals should be established.17–19 The aim of the current study was to determine the need for sex-divided reference intervals for the MPV, PDW, P-LCR, and PCT in a UK population, for the first time, using the Sysmex XN-10 automated haematology analyser.

Materials and methodsEthics, sample requirement and inclusion criteria

The current study obtained a favorable opinion from the National Research Ethics Service (NRES). Whole-blood venous samples from individuals ≥16 years old were collected in EDTA K2 Vacutainer tubes and mixed gently before testing for the FBC in the Department of Haematology at Homerton University Hospital, using the Sysmex XN-10 analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). All FBC tests were performed within 8h post-collection in accordance with standard acceptable laboratory protocols. A total of 2376 samples were assayed for platelet indices (MPV, PDW, P-LCR, and PCT) with FBC parameters within the local reference ranges as follows: haemoglobin, 130–180g/L and 115–165g/L; red blood cell count, 4.50–6.50×1012/L and 3.80–5.80×1012/L; haematocrit, 0.40–0.54L/L and 0.37–0.47L/L, for males and females, respectively; mean corpuscular volume, 80–98fL; mean corpuscular haemoglobin, 27–32pg; mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, 310–350g/L; red blood cell distribution width, 10–14%; platelet count, 150–400×109/L; white blood cell count, 4.0–11.0×109/L; neutrophil count, 2.0–7.5×109/L; lymphocyte count, 1.0–4.0×109/L; monocyte count, 0.2–1.0×109/L; eosinophil count, 0.0–0.4×109/L, and; basophil count, 0.0–0.1×109/L. Whenever routine FBC analysis is performed, the Sysmex XN-10 analyzer obligatorily generates these platelet indices (MPV, PDW, P-LCR, and PCT), which are not reported on the FBC profile ordered by the clinicians. Internal quality procedures were in place in validating the quality of the results.

Exclusion criteria and statistical analysis

Data was collected and analyzed using Microsoft office Excel (2013) and RStudio (Version 0.99.903). Statistical outliers (IQR or >Q3+1.5IQR20) were removed. The distributional assumption for a data set was visually estimated using histograms and QQ plots. All reference intervals were calculated using the mean±2SD. Independent t-tests were performed to determine whether there was a statistical significance between platelet indices in males and females. The P value ≤0.05 was adopted to denote statistical significance.21

Analysis of platelet indices

Platelet indices are calculated using the following formulae: MPV (fL)=plateletcrit/platelet count; PDW (fL)=the distribution width at the level of 20% with the peak of the histogram being at 100%; P-LCR=the percentage of platelets larger than 12fL, and; PCT=the ratio of the overall platelet volume to the overall blood volume in an individual.14

Results

After removing 20 statistical outliers, the platelet indices of 2356 individuals (791 males and 1565 females; age range from 16 to 91 years), with all FBC parameters within the local reference ranges, were analysed on the Sysmex XN-10 analyzer. The distribution of all platelet indices was Gaussian, showing approximately normally distributed histograms and QQ plots by visual examination; hence, a parametric method (mean±2SD) was used to calculate the reference intervals for all platelet indices.21

The reference intervals (mainly sex-divided) of platelet indices from six recent studies, including the current study, are presented in Table 1. The data obtained in these studied compared well with the current study. Table 2 shows the mean, SD, and P values of platelet indices for sex-divided subgroups and reference interval data for total individuals only for the PDW from the current study.

Table 1.

Comparison of reference intervals for platelet indices, using the Sysmex analytical platforms from 2012 to date.

  Pekelharing22Subhashree23Sachdev24  Abass25Maluf26  Boshnak27Current study
Year of publication  201020122014  20152015  20172017
Analytic platform  XE-5000KX-21XE-2100  KX-21XE-2100D  XT1800iXN-10
Sex-division 
Sample size  133  176  252  248  945  150  150  580  184  196  791  1565 
MPV [fL]  9.3–12.1  9.1–11.9  7.9–13.7  8.0–13.28  8.6–15.5  8.4–11.4  8.0–11.6  8.9–11.8  9.5–11.8  9.3–12.2  9.1–13.0  9.2–12.8 
PDW [fL]  10.1–16.1  9.9–15.4  9.0–16.56  8.0–13.28  8.3–25.0  8.7–15.7a  7.8–16.7a  9.6–15.3  10.4–15.9  10.0–16.9  9.3–17.0  9.3–17.3 
P-LCR [%]  18.5–42.3  17.5–42.3      11.9–66.9  12.7–36.1  10.9–38.8  15.6–39.5  21.6–39.0  20.0–42.3  17.6–47.0  17.8–47.8 
PCT [%]  0.17–0.32  0.18–0.39      0.15–0.62  0.14–0.24  0.13–0.33    0.18–0.34  0.18–0.41  0.16–0.35  0.18–0.37 

T: total individuals; M: males; and F: females.

a

Although reported separately, the PDW did not show a significant difference between males and females in Abass et al.25

Table 2.

P values, sex-specific means and standard deviations for platelet indices [MPV, PDW, P-LCR, PCT], and the PDW reference interval for total individuals on the Sysmex XN-10 in samples with FBC parameters within the local reference ranges.

Variable  Sex  Mean  SD  P value  RI for total individuals 
MPV [fL]MF10.9  0.891  0.007 
11.0  0.913   
PDW [fL]MF13.3  2.018  0.8389.3–17.3
13.3  2.004 
P-LCR [%]MF32.5  7.435  0.015 
33.3  7.728   
PCT [%]MF0.26  0.046  < 0.001 
0.28  0.049   

There was a statistically significant difference in the reference intervals for: MPV, 9.1–13.0fL [males] and 9.2–12.8fL [females] (p=0.007); P-LCR, 17.6–47.0% [males] and 17.8–47.8% [females] (p=0.015); and PCT, 0.16–0.35% [males] and 0.18–0.37% [females] (p<0.001), therefore sex-divided reference intervals for these indices are warranted. However, the reference interval between males and females for the PDW did not show a statistical difference (p=0.838), therefore a total reference interval was calculated for this particular parameter without sex division at 9.3–17.3fL (Table 2).

Discussion

Platelets are derived from the megakaryocytes and are highly complex, anucleate and the smallest cell type in the blood. The number, size, distribution, and structure of platelets are routinely evaluated in the peripheral blood smear under a light microscope. This approach has several limitations that may lead to misinterpretations and, ultimately, misdiagnoses. With the advent of automated haematology cell counters, accurate and precise measurements can be attained in a timely manner,27 nevertheless, due to different measuring principles across various laboratory machines and varying population dynamics,19 evidence continues to support the need to establish local reference intervals.17–19 The current study was performed with the objective of addressing the need for local sex-divided reference intervals for platelet indices, namely MPV, PDW, P-LCR, and PCT, using the latest Sysmex analytical module XN-10.

The age range of this study population was between 16 to 91 years, comprising both males and females. The study population was categorized according to the sex. The reference intervals for the platelet indices did not show much difference from the previously published studies, using the XE-5000,22 KX-21,23,25 XE-2100,24,26 and XT1800i,27 but Sachdev et al.24 indicated a wider distribution at the upper and lower extremes, exceeding the distribution of the current study in all platelet indices. This may be related to the use of a different instrument (i.e., different principle, reagents, and calibrations), narrower and younger age range, different male to female ratio, with male predominance, difference in time between blood collection and FBC analysis, variation in the pre-analytical variables (i.e., the method of venepuncture), and/or a less diverse ethnicity origin.

The MPV reference intervals for males and females were 9.1–13.0fL and 9.2–12.8fL, respectively, which were close to those that had been previously reported. Sex-divided reference intervals for the MPV showed a statistical significance (p=0.007) in our study; this result is in accordance with at least four previous studies.22,23,28,29

Unlike a number of previous studies,9,22,23,27 we did not find a statistically significant sex-based difference for the PDW (p=0.838), and therefore, calculated a reference interval as 9.3–17.3fL, independent of sex. Our finding correlated with some researchers, who also did not find a sex-divided statistical significance regarding the PDW.1,2,25,26

Our study identified a statistical significance in the P-LCR reference intervals between the two sex (p=0.015), therefore separate reference intervals were calculated for males and females as 17.6–47.0% and 17.8–47.8%, respectively. This finding is in agreement with Pekelharing et al.,22 who also reported reference intervals determined according to differences between the sexes (p=0.0004).

The current study also showed statistical significance (p0.001) in reference intervals between sexes for the PCT and therefore different intervals were calculated for males and females as follows: 0.16–0.35% and 0.18–0.37%, respectively. This finding closely resembles the reference intervals reported by Boshnak27 and Botma et al.2 A previous study30 likewise noted a statistically higher median PCT in females compared to males which is in keeping with the current study. However, Abass et al.25 reported lower results and Sachdev et al.24 reported widely distributed results for the PCT relative to the present study, which could be due to different pre-analytical procedures, analytical platforms, reagents, and genetic base of the population studied; Abass et al.25 used the Sysmex KX-21 and enrolled a relatively smaller number of Sudanese subjects and Sachdev et al.24 used the Sysmex XE-2100 and assayed samples from voluntary blood donations from a younger Indian population, with male predominance.

Better knowledge of platelet disorders is attained when an automated platelet count is combined with platelet indices.1 In order to achieve this, we reported reference intervals for the platelet indices, namely the MPV, PDW, P-LCR, and PCT, to allow low and high values to be facilitated in order to do further research and guide platelet disorder management. These indices are part of the standard FBC and do not add any additional costs, and therefore do not put any testing burden on the patients, nor on the clinicians.

We found a statistically significant difference in reference ranges between the sexes for the MPV, P-LCR, and PCT, necessitating sex-divided reference intervals for these parameters, but no significance was noted for the PDW, thus a reference interval for total individuals was calculated for this platelet measurement. Overall, compared with the previously reported reference intervals, our study showed comparable reference intervals for platelet indices. Further large and high-quality multi-center, multi-ethnic and multi-gender prospective studies are needed to validate the use of these platelet indices in routine clinical practice.

Conclusions

There were substantial differences between the sexes for all platelet indices, save the PDW. While a reference interval for total individuals was calculated for the PDW, separate sex-dependent reference intervals were determined for the MPV, P-LCR, and PCT.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff at the Department of Haematology at Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust for their assistance during this project.

References
[1]
M.G. Farias, E.G. Schunck, S. Dal Bó, S.M. de Castro.
Definition of reference ranges for the platelet distribution width (PDW): a local need.
Clin Chem Lab Med, 48 (2010), pp. 255-257
[2]
J. Botma, L.F. Mogongoa, A.D. Jaftha, W. Janse van Rensburg.
Reference ranges for platelet indices using Sysmex XE-2100 blood analyser.
Med Technol SA, 26 (2012), pp. 17-21
[3]
G. Lippi, F. Pavesi, S. Pipitone.
Evaluation of mean platelet volume with four haematological analyzers: harmonization is still an unresolved issue.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 26 (2015), pp. 235-237
[4]
S. Buoro, M. Seghezzi, B. Manenti, A. Pacioni, A. Carobene, F. Ceriotti, et al.
Biological variation of platelet parameters determined by the Sysmex XN hematology analyzer.
Clin Chim Acta, 470 (2017), pp. 125-132
[5]
J.C. Osselaer, J. Jamart, J.M. Scheiff.
Platelet distribution width for differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis.
Clin Chem, 43 (1997), pp. 1072-1076
[6]
H. Hong, W. Xiao, R.W. Maitta.
Steady increment of immature platelet fraction is suppressed by irradiation in single-donor platelet components during storage.
[7]
V. Chandrashekar.
Plateletcrit as a screening tool for detection of platelet quantitative disorders.
J Hematol, 2 (2013), pp. 22-26
[8]
A. Giacomini, P. Legovini, G. Gessoni, F. Antico, S. Valverde, M.M. Salvadego, et al.
Platelet count and parameters determined by the Bayer ADVIA 120 in reference subjects and patients.
Clin Lab Haematol, 23 (2001), pp. 181-186
[9]
P. Adibi, E. Faghih Imani, M. Talaei, M. Ghanei.
Population-based platelet reference values for an Iranian population.
Int J Lab Hematol, 29 (2007), pp. 195-199
[10]
C. Briggs, P. Harrison, S.J. Machin.
Continuing developments with the automated platelet count.
Int J Lab Hematol, 29 (2007), pp. 77-91
[11]
C. D'Souza, C. Briggs, S.J. Machin.
Platelets: the few, the young, and the active.
Clin Lab Med, 35 (2015), pp. 123-131
[12]
S.G. Chu, R.C. Becker, P.B. Berger, D.L. Bhatt, J.W. Eikelboom, B. Konkle, et al.
Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Thromb Haemost, 8 (2010), pp. 148-156
[13]
M.J. Beard, Z. Jeewa, S. Bashir, R. Cardigan, S. Thomas.
Comparison of platelet activation in platelet concentrates measured by flow cytometry or ADVIA 2120.
[14]
K. Kaito, H. Otsubo, N. Usui, M. Yoshida, J. Tanno, E. Kurihara, et al.
Platelet size deviation width, platelet large cell ratio, and mean platelet volume have sufficient sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia.
Br J Haematol, 128 (2005), pp. 698-702
[15]
Z. Zhang, X. Xu, H. Ni, H. Deng.
Platelet indices are novel predictors of hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients.
J Crit Care, 29 (2014), pp. 1-6
[16]
J. Tang, X. Gao, M. Zhi, H.M. Zhou, M. Zhang, H.W. Chen, et al.
Plateletcrit: a sensitive biomarker for evaluating disease activity in Crohn's disease with low hs-CRP.
J Dig Dis, 16 (2015), pp. 118-124
[17]
M.G. Farias, E.G. Schunck, S. Dal Bó, S.M. de Castro.
Definition of reference ranges for the platelet distribution width (pdw): a local need.
Clin Chem Lab Med, 48 (2010), pp. 255-257
[18]
L. Wakeman, S. Al-Ismail, A. Benton, A. Beddall, A. Gibbs, S. Hartnell, et al.
Robust, routine haematology reference ranges for healthy adults.
Int J Lab Hematol, 29 (2007), pp. 279-283
[19]
S.M. Lewis, B.J. Bain, I. Bates.
Dacie and Lewis practical haematology.
10th ed., Churchill Livingstone, (2006),
[20]
H.E. Solberg, A. Lahti.
Detection of outliers in reference distributions: performance of Horn's algorithm.
Clin Chem, 51 (2005), pp. 2326-2332
[21]
K.K. Sehgal, D. Tina, U. Choksey, R.J. Dalal, K.J. Shanaz.
Reference range evaluation of complete blood count parameters with emphasis on newer research parameters on the complete blood count analyzer Sysmex XE-2100.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 56 (2013), pp. 120-124
[22]
J.M. Pekelharing, O. Hauss, R. De Jonge, J. Lokhoff, J. Sodikromo, M. Spaans, et al.
Haematology reference intervals for established and novel parameters in healthy adults.
Sysmex Diagn Perspect, 1 (2010), pp. 1-11
[23]
A.R. Subhashree, P.J. Parameaswari, B. Shanthi, C. Revathy, B.O. Parijatham.
The reference intervals for the haematological parameters in healthy adult population of Chennai Southern India.
J Clin Diagn Res, 6 (2012), pp. 1675-1680
[24]
R. Sachdev, A.K. Tiwari, S. Goel, V. Raina, M. Sethi.
Establishing biological reference intervals for novel platelet parameters (immature platelet fraction, high immature platelet fraction, platelet distribution width, platelet large cell ratio, platelet-X, plateletcrit, and platelet distribution width) and their correlations among each other.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 57 (2014), pp. 231-235
[25]
A.E. Abass, I. Ismail, Razazyahia, E. Ali, R. Mohammed, S. Mohammed, et al.
Reference value of platelets count and indices in Sudanese using Sysmex KX-21.
Int J Healthcare Sci, 3 (2015), pp. 120-125
[26]
C.B. Maluf, S.M. Barreto, P.G. Vidigal.
Standardization and reference intervals of platelet volume indices: Insight from the Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-BRASIL).
Platelets, 26 (2015), pp. 413-420
[27]
N.H. Boshnak.
Reference intervals for platelet indices using Sysmex XT-1800i in Egyptian population.
Int J Med Health Res, 3 (2017), pp. 4-11
[28]
B.J. Bain.
Platelet count and platelet size in males and females.
Scand J Haematol, 35 (1985), pp. 77-79
[29]
A.M. Butkiewicz, H. Kemona, V. Dymicka-Piekarska, J. Matowicka-Karna, P. Radziwon, A. Lipska.
Platelet count, mean platelet volume and thrombocytopoietic indices in healthy women and men.
Thromb Res, 118 (2006), pp. 199-204
[30]
M.J. Kim, P.W. Park, Y.H. Seo, K.H. Kim, J.Y. Seo, J.H. Jeong, et al.
Reference intervals for platelet parameters in Korean adults using ADVIA 2120.
Ann Lab Med, 33 (2013), pp. 364-366
Copyright © 2018. Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools