Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue S2.
Pages S338-S339 (October 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 44. Issue S2.
Pages S338-S339 (October 2022)
Open Access
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DEFERIPRONE: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS IN IRON-OVERLOADED PATIENTS WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE AND OTHER ANEMIAS
Visits
448
M Hamdya, A El-Beshlawyb, FS Ebeidc, JL Kwiatkowskid, J Kantere, B Inusaf, S Williamsg, M Verissimoh, D Leei, NT Temini, C Fradettei, F Trictai, MS Elalfyc
a Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
b Pediatric Hospital of Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
c Ain Shams University, Pediatric Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
d The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
e University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA
f Paediatric Haematology, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas'NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
g The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
h Centro Infantil Boldrini, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
i Chiesi Canada Corporation, Toronto, Canada
Ver más
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 44. Issue S2
More info
Objectives

Deferiprone (DFP), an oral iron chelator, has recently been approved as the first-line treatment for transfusional iron overload in pediatric and adult patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and other anemias. The FIRST study (NCT02041299) reported that DFP is noninferior to Deferoxamine (DFO) in patients with SCD and iron overload (as assessed by Liver Iron Concentration [LIC]) and has an acceptable safety profile. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of FIRST to assess whether the efficacy and safety of DFP are comparable to DFO in children with SCD.

Methods

In this multicenter, 2-arm, randomized, open-label study, eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive DFP or DFO for 12 months. The subgroup analysis included children (2–16 years of age) with SCD or another rare anemia who were treated for transfusional iron overload. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in LIC from baseline to month 12. Safety was assessed by Adverse Events (AEs) in the study period.

Results

The safety analysis was composed of 128 (DFP, n = 86; DFO, n = 42) children; most (DFP, 76%; DFO, 81%) had a primary diagnosis of SCD (HbS). Mean age (SD) in the DFP and DFO arms were 9.9 (3.7) and 10.9 (3.0) years (p = 0.09), respectively. 5 children in the DFP arm withdrew due to AEs and 19 (DFP, n = 14; DFO, n = 5) for other reasons. Children treated with DFP or DFO showed no difference in the number of AEs (p = 0.77; including neutropenia [p = 0.30]), severe AEs (p = 0.10), serious AEs (p = 0.16), or withdrawals due to AEs (p = 0.17). Overall incidence of nonserious AEs possibly related to treatment was higher with DFP than DFO (59% vs. 33%; p = 0.01). Transient elevation of liver enzymes was significantly higher with DFP (p = 0.03). 1 child developed agranulocytosis during parvovirus infection, which resolved the following day. In the efficacy population, there was no significant difference in mean (SD) LIC decrease from baseline to 12 months with DFP compared to DFO (-3.39 ± 4.24 mg/g vs. -2.99 ± 3.16 mg/g, respectively; p = 0.57).

Discussion

This pediatric subgroup analysis corroborates previous findings that DFP is comparable to DFO in safely reducing LIC in children with transfusion-dependent anemias. No new safety concerns were observed in children that have not been previously noted in other populations.

Conclusion

The present findings on DFP may benefit children with SCD and their healthcare providers when considering effective iron chelation therapy that may also address treatment-adherence concerns.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools