Journal Information
Vol. 36. Issue 5.
Pages 381 (September - October 2014)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 36. Issue 5.
Pages 381 (September - October 2014)
Erratum
Open Access
Erratum to “Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?” [Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 2014;36(3):219–225]
Visits
630
Samuel Ricardo Comar
Corresponding author
srcomar@ufpr.br

Corresponding author at: Laboratório de Hematologia, Unidade de Apoio Diagnóstico, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Rua Padre Camargo, 280, Alto da Glória, 80060-240 Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
, Mariester Malvezzi, Ricardo Pasquini
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil
Related content
Samuel Ricardo Comar, Mariester Malvezzi, Ricardo Pasquini
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text

In the article “Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?”, published in Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014;36(3):219–25, please consider the following corrections:

  • Page 221, Table 1, Criteria or rule 12 “>100×109/μL” should read as “>100×103/μL”.

  • Page 223, Table 6, Sensitivity “62.6%” should read as “63.2%”; Positive predictive value “71.2%” should read as “71.6%”; and Efficiency “73.8%” should read as “73.9%”.

Copyright © 2014. Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools