HEMO 2025 / III Simpósio Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo
Mais dadosRadiolabeling of hematologic and immune cells has revolutionized diagnostic imaging in recent decades, enabling the precise tracking of infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune, and neoplastic processes. With advances in radioisotope production and imaging equipment, nuclear hematology has assumed a central role in nuclear medicine, opening new frontiers for personalized diagnosis and treatment.
ObjectivesTo quantitatively evaluate the number of publications reporting the use of radioisotopes in labeling some hematological and immune cells.
Material and methodsA quantitative analysis of the literature was performed based on the PubMed/Medline database, covering the period from 2015 to 2025, for full papers. The search was conducted by combining descriptors related to the main cell types (such as erythrocytes, leukocytes, macrophages, monocytes, stem cells, and T cells) with the most commonly used radioisotopes (technetium-99m, copper-64, fluorine-18, gallium-68, and zirconium-89).
Discussion and conclusionThe analysis yielded 1,096 articles. The results show a distinct distribution among the radioisotopes used: technetium-99m (Tc-99m) leads with 46% of publications, followed by fluorine-18 (F-18) with 24%, zirconium-89 (Zr-89) with 16%, gallium-68 (Ga-68) with 9%, and copper-64 (Cu-64) with 6%. When analyzing cell types, leukocytes appear in 25% of publications, macrophages in 21%, stem cells in 18%, erythrocytes in 14%, T cells in 14%, mesenchymal stem cells in 5%, monocytes in 3%, and dendritic cells in 1%. While Tc-99m predominates in most studies, Zr-89 was preferred for T-cell research, with 55 citations compared to only 23 for Tc-99m. The physicochemical characteristics of radioisotopes provide advantages and disadvantages for different types of studies, particularly their half-lives: Ga-68 (68 minutes), F-18 (110 minutes), Tc-99m (6 hours), Cu-64 (12.7 hours), and Zr-89 (3.3 days). The longer half-life of Zr-89 makes it ideal for studies requiring prolonged follow-up, such as monitoring CAR-T cells in immunotherapies. Factors such as cost and availability also significantly influence the choice of radioisotopes, making Tc-99m the radioisotope of choice, since it is the most readily available. From a cellular perspective, radiolabeled leukocytes determine the location of infectious processes, differentiating them from sterile inflammation; labeled macrophages have been used to track inflammation sites in autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis; radiolabeled red blood cells locate hemorrhagic foci; radiolabeled stem cells have been used to assess cell migration, differentiation, and integration in different tissues; and radiolabeled T cells are essential for assessing the distribution of these cells after reinjection into patients. Despite the technical challenges inherent in integrating two complex techniques—the manipulation of blood elements and the use of radioisotopes—cellular radiolabeling has established itself as an indispensable tool for both precise clinical management and the development of new therapies. These findings reinforce the need for continued investment in the development of innovative radiopharmaceuticals and the optimization of imaging techniques, aiming to expand the potential of this area of modern medicine.
References:
Grant: FAPESP 2021/10265-8 Cancer Theranostic Innovation Center (CancerThera).




