Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 43. Núm. S1.
Páginas S98 (Outubro 2021)
Compartilhar
Compartilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 43. Núm. S1.
Páginas S98 (Outubro 2021)
Open Access
PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA IN THE MAGNIFY PHASE 3B INTERIM ANALYSIS OF INDUCTION R2 FOLLOWED BY MAINTENANCE
Visitas
1316
M Colemana, DJ Andorskyb, A Yacoubc, JM Meleard, SR Fanninge, KS Kolibabaf, F Lansigang, C Reynoldsh, G Nowakowskii, M Ghariboj, E Ahnj, J Lij, MJ Rummelk, JP Sharmanl
a Clinical Research Alliance Inc, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
b Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Boulder, United States
c University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, United States
d Texas Oncology – Austin, US Oncology Research, Austin, United States
e Prisma Health, US Oncology Research, Greenville, United States
f US Oncology Research, Vancouver, United States
g Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, United States
h IHA Hematology Oncology Consultants – Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, United States
i Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
j Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States
k Justus-Liebig Universität, Giessen, Germany
l Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, US Oncology Research, Eugene, United States
Ver más
Este item recebeu

Under a Creative Commons license
Informação do artigo
Suplemento especial
Este artigo faz parte de:
Vol. 43. Núm S1
Mais dados
Objectives

Relapse is expected when treating patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), with a shortened response associated with each relapse. Lenalidomide combined with rituximab (R2) has shown enhanced activity, with a recently reported median progression free-survival (PFS) of 39.4 months in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including those with FL and MZL (Augment; J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1188).

Materials and methods

MAGNIFY is a multicenter, phase 3b trial (NCT01996865) in patients with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL) grades 1–3b, transformed FL (tFL), MZL, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Lenalidomide 20 mg on d 1–21 of a 28-d cycle + rituximab 375 mg/m2/wk cycle 1 and then every 8 wk starting with cycle 3 (R2) is given for 12 cycles followed by 1:1 randomization in patients with stable disease, partial response, or complete response/complete response unconfirmed (CR/CRu) to R2 vs rituximab maintenance for 18 mo. The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS) by 1999 International Working Group criteria. Secondary end points include safety, CR rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of CR, time-to-response, time-to-next antilymphoma therapy, and overall survival. Data presented here focus on induction R2 in efficacy-evaluable patients with MZL compared with the overall population of FL grades 1–3a+MZL (not including FL grade 3b, tFL, or MCL) receiving ≥ 1 treatment with baseline/post-baseline assessments.

Results

As of August 28, 2020, 394 patients with FL grades 1–3a and MZL enrolled; 76 (19%) had MZL. The median age of patients with MZL was 68 years (range, 46–90), 68 (89%) had stage III/IV disease, and 72 (95%) had prior rituximab-containing therapy. Overall response rate in the MZL and overall population was 66% and 75% with 39% and 44% having a CR/CRu. Median DOR was 38.6 months (95% CI, 29.4–not reached [NR]) and NR (95% CI, 38.6–NR). The median PFS was 40.9 months (95% CI, 27.8–NR) and 41.2 months (95% CI, 38.7–NR). In the MZL population, 43 patients (57%) have completed 12 cycles of R2, and 42 (55%) have been randomized and entered maintenance. Twenty-eight patients (37%) prematurely discontinued both lenalidomide and rituximab, primarily due to adverse events (AEs; n = 11; 14%) and progressive disease (n = 6; 8%). The most common (≥ 20%) all-grade AEs were neutropenia (49%), fatigue (43%), diarrhea (37%), thrombocytopenia (24%), constipation (24%), and anemia (22%). Most common (≥ 10%) grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (41%; 1 patient [1%] had febrile neutropenia), thrombocytopenia (13%), and leukopenia (13%).

Discussion

R2 is active with a tolerable safety profile in patients with R/R MZL. The efficacy and safety profile of R2 in patient with MZL were similar to results observed in the overall MAGNIFY population.

Conclusions

These results suggest that R2 should be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with R/R MZL.

O texto completo está disponível em PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas