Journal Information
Visits
113
Original article
Full text access
Uncorrected Proof. Available online 4 April 2025
Ocular graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a pediatric population
Visits
113
Cinthia Kima,
Corresponding author
laopadilha@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Patricia Cabral Zacharias Serapicosa, Flávio Eduardo Hiraia, Cintia Monteiro Lutosab, Adriane da Silva Santos Ibanezb, Victor Gottardello Zecchinb, Lauro Augusto de Oliveiraa
a Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil
b Pediatric Oncology Institute, GRAACC, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (4)
Table 1. Patient demographics and transplant characteristics.
Tables
Table 2. Risk factors for systemic graft-versus-host disease (n = 105).
Tables
Table 3. Ocular graft-versus-host disease patient characteristics.
Tables
Table 4. Risk factors for ocular graft-versus-host disease (n = 105).
Tables
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Aim

To determine the prevalence of ocular graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to characterize the risk factors associated with its development in a pediatric population.

Methods

This retrospective chart review included 105 patients during a five-year period (2013–2017) from the Pediatric Oncology Institute (GRAACC-UNIFESP). The diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease was performed by the treating hematologist in conjunction with an ophthalmologist in accordance to National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria.

Results

Systemic graft-versus-host disease occurred in 44 of 105 (41.9%) patients, predominantly in males (54.5%) whereas ocular disease was diagnosed in seven (6.7%) of the patients. All the analyzed risk factors including diagnosis, type of conditioning regimen, use of radiotherapy in conditioning, donor sex, type and source of graft, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, and sex mismatch were not statistically significantly associated with the development of ocular disease, except for age. Ocular graft-versus-host disease patients presented a higher mean age compared to patients without ocular disease (p-value = 0.015).

Conclusion

Although less prevalent than in adults, ocular morbidity remains a concern in pediatric patients following allogeneic transplantation. Early diagnosis and regular ophthalmic follow-ups are recommended after the transplantation regardless of systemic graft-versus-host disease status.

Key words:
Graft-versus-host disease
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Ocular graft-versus-host disease
Dry eye
Full Text
Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established therapeutic modality for hematological neoplasms and non-neoplastic hematological disorders. The number of patients receiving this therapy has increased as a result of improvements in the assessment of the compatibility of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in conjunction with advances in pre- and post-transplantation therapeutic regimens, as well as better supportive care. However, the occurrence of complications is increasing due to the longer survival of patients after transplantation [1].

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after aHSCT. It is mediated primarily by donor T lymphocytes that recognize and target host antigens leading to inflammation and fibrosis of affected tissues. This condition usually occurs in the first three years after transplantation and can affect several organs such as skin, lung, liver, gastrointestinal tract, oral mucosa, the musculoskeletal system and eyes [1,2].

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus in 2005, GvHD can be classified as acute or chronic. The chronic form is the most common affecting 30–70% of transplanted patients [3], however there are high concordance rates between both forms as the acute form is considered a strong predictor of chronic disease. Przepiorka et al. [4] reported that patients with acute GvHD had a higher risk of chronic disease and therefore the risk factors for acute GvHD can also be applied to the chronic form [1,4].

Ocular GvHD can occur in both forms, although it is more commonly seen in the chronic form [4]. Its incidence, of between 30% and 85%, is widely variable [1]. Ocular manifestations primarily affect the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal glands, eyelids and meibomian glands with dry eye syndrome (DES) or keratoconjunctivitis sicca being the most common manifestation in oGvHD [5].

Major symptoms of oGvHD are irritation, burning, pain, redness, foreign body sensation, excessive tearing, light sensitivity and visual haze. Clinical findings may include acute conjunctival inflammation, conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, pseudomembranous epitheliopathy, filaments, painful erosions, cicatricial conjunctivitis, corneal opacification, corneal ulceration, and perforation. Disease severity is variable and can negatively affect quality of life and daily life activities [1,2,6].

The risk factors for oGvHD are not well understood but it is known that history of acute and severity of chronic GvHD, female donor, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, conditioning regimen, and HLA mismatch are associated with increased development of ocular disease [1,2,5].

This study aims to determine the frequency of oGvHD after allo-HSCT and to identify risk factors associated with its development in a population of a pediatric oncology center.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study based on a database review of allo-HSCT patients from January 2013 to December 2017 at the Pediatric Oncology Institute (GRAACC - Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer), Federal University of São Paulo. During the study period, 108 patients underwent allo-HSCT. All medical records were reviewed, and clinical data were collected including demographic details, diagnosis, conditioning regime, source of graft, type of transplant, donor characteristics (sex, HLA matching), occurrence of acute or chronic systemic GvHD, and occurrence of oGvHD.

The diagnoses of systemic GvHD and oGvHD were performed by the treating hematologist in conjunction with an ophthalmologist in accordance to the 2005 and 2014 NIH consensus criteria (low Schirmer test values with a mean value of both eyes ≤5 mm at five minutes or a new onset of keratoconjunctivitis sicca by slit-lamp examination with mean values of 6–10 mm in the Schirmer test) [7].

The diagnoses of acute and chronic GvHD were based on clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and whenever possible, on histopathologic findings of skin, oral mucosa and the gastrointestinal tract. The current consensus considers that clinical manifestations, and not the time to symptomatic onset after transplantation, determine whether the clinical syndrome of GvHD is considered acute or chronic [8].

Data were collected and presented in contingency tables. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney test and categorical variables using the Fisher exact test. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were achieved using the Stata v.14 computer program (College Station, Texas).

Results

A total of 108 pediatric patients were submitted to allo-HSCT and were regularly followed up at the Pediatric Oncology Institute - GRAACC - UNIFESP during the study period. All transplants were performed by the same hematology team supervised by the same physician. Of these patients, 105 survived longer than 90 days after allo-HSCT and were included in this study. Three patients died due to disease progression a few weeks after the transplant and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Patient demographics and transplant characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Patient demographics and transplant characteristics.

Characteristic  n (%) 
Total patients - n  105 
Age (mean) – n (range)  9.4 (1.8–17.9) 
Sex (male:female) – n (%)  63:42 (60:40) 
Disease – n (%)   
ALL  38 (36) 
AML  29 (28) 
AA  15 (14) 
Others  23 (22) 
Stem cell source – n (%)   
Bone marrow  88 (84) 
Peripheral blood  12 (11) 
Cord blood  5 (5) 
Donor sex (male:female) – n (%)  52:53 (50/50) 
Donor and HLA histocompatibility – n %)   
Related identical donor  40 (38) 
Mismatched related donor  10 (10) 
Unrelated identical donor  35 (33) 
Mismatched unrelated donor  20 (19) 
Conditioning regimen (type) - n (%)   
Myeloablative  83 (79) 
Reduced Intensity  22 (21) 
Conditioning radiotherapy – n (%)   
Yes  54 (51) 
No  51 (49) 
Conditioning regimen – n (%)   
TBI + F + Cy  24 (23) 
TBI + ETO  16 (15) 
TBI + Cy  13 (12) 
Bu + M  12 (11) 
F + Cy + ATG  7 (7) 
ALEM + F + M  7 (7) 
Bu + M + ATG  6 (6) 
Bu + Cy + M + ATG  4 (4) 
Bu + Cy +M  4 (4) 
Others  12 (11) 
GvHD prophylaxis – n (%)   
CsA + MTX  40 (38) 
CsA  31 (29) 
Cy+ MMF + TAC  14 (13) 
MTX + TAC  9 (9) 
CsA + MMF  8 (8) 
CsA + MMF + Cy  1 (1) 
CsA  1 (1) 
MTX  1 (1) 

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; AA, aplastic anemia; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; TBI, total body irradiation; FLU, fludarabine; CY, Cyclophosphamide; ETO, etoposide (Etoposide); BU, busulfan; M, melphalan; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; ALEM, alemtuzumab; CsA, cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules); MTX, methotrexate (Methotrexate); MMF, mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept); TAC, tacrolimus; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease.

The mean age of this population was 9.4 (standard deviation [SD]: 4.9) years and 63 (60%) were male. The most common indications for allo-HSCT were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 38; 36.2%), followed by acute myeloid leukemia (n = 29; 27.6%), aplastic anemia (n = 15; 14.3%), and other reasons (n = 23; 21.9%).

Systemic GvHD occurred in 44 (41.9%) individuals in this study population with 24 (54.5%) being male. The mean age of those with systemic GvHD was 8.8 (SD: 5.3) years compared to those without GvHD (9.5; SD: 4.6 years; p-value = 0.491). Potential risk factors associated with the development of systemic GvHD were analyzed in this population. None of the risk factors analyzed were significantly associated with the development of systemic GvHD (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk factors for systemic graft-versus-host disease (n = 105).

Risk factor  Systemic GvHDp-value 
  No (n = 61)  Yes (n = 44)   
Age, years – mean (SD)  9.5 (4.6)  8.8 (5.3)  0.491 
Sex – n (%)      0.333 
Male  39 (63.9)  24 (54.5)   
Female  22 (36.1)  20 (45.4)   
Diagnosis – n (%)      0.852 
AAL  22 (36.1)  16 (36.3)   
AML  17 (27.9)  12 (27.3)   
AA  10 (16.4)  5 (11.4)   
Others  12 (19.6)  11 (25.0)   
Conditioning regiment – n (%)      0.704 
Myeloablative  49 (80.3)  34 (77.3)   
Reduced intensity  12 (19.7)  10 (22.7)   
Radiotherapy conditioning – n (%)      0.587 
No  31 (50.8)  20 (45.4)   
Yes  30 (49.2)  24 (54.6)   
Donor sex – n (%)      0.632 
Male  29 (47.5)  23 (52.3)   
Female  32 (52.5)  21 (47.7)   
Source of graft – n (%)      0.862 
Bone marrow  49 (87.5)  39 (88.6)   
Peripheral blood  7 (12.5)  5 (11.4)   
Type of transplant – n (%)      0.242 
Related donor  29 (47.5)  26 (59.1)   
Unrelated donor  32 (52.5)  18 (40.9)   
HLA mismatch – n (%)      0.724 
No  41 (67.2)  31 (70.4)   
Yes  20 (32.8)  13 (29.6)   
Sex mismatch – n (%)      0.912 
No  27 (44.3)  19 (43.2)   
Yes  34 (55.7)  25 (56.8)   

GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; SD, standard deviation; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; AA, aplastic anemia.

A total of 40 (38.1%) individuals presented acute GvHD; the organs involved were skin in 36 (90.0%), liver in three (7.5%), and the gastrointestinal tract in eight (20.0%). Chronic GvHD occurred in 33 patients (31.4%); the organs involved were skin (n = 16; 48.5%), liver (n = 7; 21.2%), lungs (n = 6; 18.2%), the gastrointestinal tract (n = 4, 12.1%), mouth (n = 11; 33.3%), and eyes (n = 7; 21.2%). Eighteen out of 33 subjects (54.5%) had chronic GvHD following acute GvHD, while 15 (45.5%) had chronic GvHD occurring de novo.

Ocular GvHD was diagnosed in seven patients with GvHD (7/105; 6.7%). There were no cases of acute ocular disease. The characteristics of these patients are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Ocular graft-versus-host disease patient characteristics.

Patient 
Sex 
Age  18  15  10  12  11  13  16 
Diagnosis  AA  ALL  AML  AML  AML  AML  ALL 
Conditioning regimen  Reduced intensity  Myeloablative  Myeloablative  Myeloablative  Myeloablative  Myeloablative  Myeloablative 
Conditioning radiotherapy  No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes 
Source of graft  Bone marrow  Bone marrow  Bone marrow  Bone marrow  Bone marrow  Bone marrow  Bone marrow 
Donor and HLA histocompatibility  Related identical  Unrelated identical  Related identical  Related identical  Related identical  Unrelated identical  Unrelated identical 
Onset of GvHD (days)  225  69  260  364  378  366  121 
Slit lamp examination  Corneal Punctate epithelial erosions  Corneal Punctate epithelial erosions  Corneal punctate epithelial erosions  Corneal punctate epithelial erosions  Conjunctival hyperemia, corneal punctate epithelial erosions  Conjunctival hyperemia,Corneal punctate epithelial erosions  Corneal punctate epithelial erosions 
Schirmer`s test (mean value in mm)  5.5  4.5  7.5  2.5 
Eye treatment  lubricant eye drops+ topical cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules)  lubricant eye drops+ topical cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules)  lubricant eye drops+ topical cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules)  lubricant eye drops+ topical cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules)  lubricant eye drops+ topical tacrolimus and steroid  lubricant eye drops+ topical steroid  lubricant eye drops 
Immunosuppression after GVDH  Yes (PDN + CsA)  Yes (PDN + TAC)  Yes (PDN + CsA + IM)  Yes (PDN + CsA)  Yes (PDN + CsA + MTX + IM)  No  Yes (PDN + CsA + MFM + TAC) 
Other organs involved  none  skin  skin, mouth, lungs  none  skin, lungs  skin  skin, mouth, liver, osteoarticular 

M, male; F, female; AA, aplastic anemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; PDN, prednisone; CsA, cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules) TAC, tacrolimus; IM, imatinib; MTX, methotrexate (Methotrexate); MMF, mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept).

Ocular GvHD occurred in six (14.3%) cases with systemic GvHD compared to only one (1.6%) case among those without systemic GvHD (p-value = 0.016). Those who developed ocular GvHD were older than those who did not develop the condition (13.5 versus 8.9 years, respectively; p-value = 0.015). All other factors analyzed were not associated with oGVHD (Table 4).

Table 4.

Risk factors for ocular graft-versus-host disease (n = 105).

Risk factorOcular GvHDp-value
No (n = 98)  Yes (n = 7) 
Age, years – mean (SD)  8.9 (4.9)  13.5 (3.4)  0.015 
Sex - n (%)      0.700 
Male  58 (59.2)  5 (71.4)   
Female  40 (40.8)  2 (28.6)   
Diagnosis - n (%)      0.280 
AAL  36 (36.7)  2 (28.6)   
AML  25 (25.5)  4 (57.1)   
AA  14 (14.3)  1 (14.3)   
Others  23 (23.5)  0 (0)   
Conditioning regiment - n (%)      0.547 
Myeloablative  77 (78.6)  6 (85.7)   
Reduced intensity  21 (21.4)  1 (14.3)   
Radiotherapy conditioning - n (%)      0.711 
No  47 (47.9)  4 (57.1)   
Yes  51 (52.0)  3 (42.9)   
Donor sex - n (%)      0.437 
Male  50 (51.0)  2 (28.6)   
Female  48 (48.9)  5 (71.4)   
Source of graft - n (%)      0.603 
Bone marrow  82 (88.2)  6 (85.7)   
Peripheral blood  11 (11.8)  1 (14.3)   
Type of transplant - n (%)      0.706 
Related donor  52 (53.1)  3 (42.8)   
Unrelated donor  46 (46.9)  4 (57.2)   
HLA mismatch - n (%)      0.429 
No  66 (67.3)  6 (85.7)   
Yes  32 (32.7)  1 (14.3)   
Sex mismatch - n (%)      0.463 
No  44 (44.9)  2 (28.6)   
Yes  54 (55.1)  5 (71.4)   

SD, standard deviation; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; AA, aplastic anemia.

Discussion

The incidence and risk factors associated with the development of oGvHD were analyzed in a single-institution chart review over a five-year period. The incidence of oGvHD in allo-HSCT patients varies widely from 30 to 70%, partly due to different diagnostic criteria. Approximately 40–90% of patients with systemic chronic GvHD will develop ocular disease which is usually diagnosed within two years of chronic GvHD diagnosis [1,5,9,10,11].

Several risk factors have been associated to systemic GvHD and oGvHD in adult patients. Previous history of acute GvHD is known to be a strong risk factor for chronic GvHD development [12]. Other risk factors such as severity of systemic GvHD, use of peripheral blood stem cells, recipient age and donor-recipient sex mismatch have been shown to increase the risk of chronic GvHD [5,6,12,13]. However, these findings are mostly based on adult patients and rarely in pediatric populations. Recipient age has been identified as one of the major risk factors for chronic GvHD in several studies with younger patients being considered to have less risk [14–17].

Kondo et al. reported a lower incidence of chronic GvHD in a pediatric population (22%) when compared to studies in adult populations. They also reported that older patients (>10 years) had an increased risk of chronic GvHD [14]. Locatelli et al. [18] reported a similar low incidence of chronic GvHD in children (24%). Furthermore, Eisner et al. [19] reported a low incidence (29%) of chronic GvHD and found that recipient age was an important risk factor in pediatric patients, although this was not confirmed by multivariate analysis. Recipient age is therefore an important risk factor for chronic GvHD in children. In addition to recipient age, Kondo et al.[14] reported that acute GvHD, malignant disease, and a female donor to male recipient were identified as significant risk factors for chronic GvHD. In several reports, a female donor to male recipient was recognized as a risk factor for chronic GvHD based on the alloimmunization of the female donor [15,17]. In childhood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), however, HLA-identical siblings are rarely alloimmunized, and alloimmunized female donors would be considered non-identical. Therefore, it is unclear whether alloimmunization affects the development of chronic GvHD in childhood HSCT [14].

Reports on incidence rate and risk factors for oGvHD are poorly documented in the pediatric age group. Bradfield et al. reported an incidence of oGvHD in three of 93 patients (3.2%) who underwent transplantation [11]. Fahnehjelm et al. reported DES in 37 of 60 children (61.7%) who had undergone HSCT. They also found that DES was more common in female patients with malignant diseases, in male patients who underwent HSCT at older ages, and in patients who were exposed to repeated high trough levels of cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules) for immunosuppression. There were no associations between prolonged corticosteroid treatment, irradiation treatment or chronic GvHD with DES in the mentioned study. As previously reported in other studies, they also demonstrated that older recipients presented higher risk of developing oGvHD after allo-HSCT [20].

Suh et al. assessed ocular findings in 104 pediatric bone marrow recipients in a two-year follow-up. DES was found in 12.5%, cataracts in 23%, and fundus complications in 13.5% of the patients [21]. Accordingly, Bradifield et al. reported ocular complications in 20.3% of children who underwent organ and bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Cataracts were the most common ocular complication following the use of systemic steroids. The reported prevalence of cataracts in children has varied from 8.5% to 80% [11,21].

A high prevalence of DES, ranging from 17 to 44%, has been reported in studies of adult BMT. These studies also found a strong association between DES and the occurrence of acute GvHD. Suh et al. [21] found a lower prevalence of DES (12.5%) in a pediatric population. They also demonstrated associations between the occurrences of acute and chronic GvHD and DES (77% and 48% of DES patients, respectively).

In this study the prevalence of oGvHD was 6.7%, a lower prevalence compared to the general population but similar to other pediatric studies. In the current series, older patients presented a higher risk for oGvHD. None of other risk factors analyzed such as conditioning regime, source of graft, sex mismatch or malignant disease were associated with the development of oGvHD.

A lower prevalence of DES may be explained by the retrospective nature of the study and the fact that the evaluation of DES was less comprehensive than in prospective studies on adults. Mild cases of DES in preverbal children are more difficult to diagnose since children express subjective symptoms less frequently than adults. Worse yet, young children are harder to examine using the fluorescein staining and Schirmer tests. That said, the prevalence of DES may have been underestimated in this study. Ng et al. reported that 51.7% of pediatric BMT patients had tear abnormalities; none of these patients had dry eye symptoms despite a third of them having patchy fluorescein staining of the cornea [22].

Management of chronic oGvHD is essentially the same as for other types of severe dry eye disease, but understanding the status of the patient's systemic GvHD can influence the ocular treatment strategy. Therefore, multidisciplinary assessments with an ophthalmologist and hematologist-oncologist are important [23].

The supportive care goals for oGvHD involve lubrication, control of tear evaporation, control of tear drainage, epithelial support and reduction of ocular surface inflammation. The treatment needs to be matched to the particular mix of symptoms of each patient; the individual's systemic medications also should be taken into account [23]. The first steps in reducing the symptoms of decreased tearing are preservative-free artificial tears and punctal occlusion with silicone plugs or cautery. In case of severe or persistent epithelial damage, autologous serum eyedrops, which contain many growth factors and vitamins that support the healing and integrity of the ocular surface, can be prescribed. Topical therapies, such as corticosteroid or cyclosporine (Cyclosporine capsules) drops, can be effective and optimization of these therapies is warranted. Ocular care also consists of photoprotection along with regular evaluations for infection, cataract formation, and increased intraocular pressure. Regional care may include ocular ointments, a humidified environment, occlusive eye wear, moisture chamber eyeglasses, or gas permeable scleral contact lens for symptomatic relief [24].

It is important to follow transplant patients closely with serial Schirmer tests to assess the degree of wetting and to intervene early at the onset of ocular involvement even prior to the evolution of symptoms [24]. The Schirmer test without anesthesia may be difficult to perform and it is not recommended in younger children; an ophthalmologist's input may be needed for objective scoring in these children [25]. For children who are old enough to tolerate the procedure, routine Schirmer evaluations should be done to monitor tear production [24]. Chronic oGvHD might impact on the quality of life of the pediatric population especially those who have not even reached economically active age.

There is a lack of studies focused in oGvHD in children. A few reports from the United States [11,21], Japan [14] and Italy [26] have already reported their experience but no report on this issue in Brazil was found.

A few limitations should be mentioned in the current study. Due to the retrospective nature of the analysis, it was not possible to establish baseline ophthalmic examinations prior to allo-HSCT and to determine the potential influence of the conditioning regimen on the ocular surface. Diagnosis of oGvHD was based on Schirmer's test or subjective symptoms according to the NIH criteria (2005). Decreased corneal sensitivity may underestimate changes of the ocular surface and allow false negatives results. Less comprehensive and not always reliable information in preverbal children may also underestimate oGvHD prevalence.

It is recommended that a baseline ocular profile of tear dynamics and ocular surface parameters should be conducted before allo-HSCT as well as regular ophthalmological examinations after the procedure, rather than relying exclusively on the NIH criteria. This might enable the use of measurable clinical and objective parameters to avoid false negative cases. That said, a prospective study setting with a baseline ocular surface work up before allo-HSCT and setting a disease (oGvHD) cutoff point using the metric parameters proposed by the International Chronic Ocular GvHD Consensus group [27] may provide more reliable data.

Conclusion

Although with a relatively lower prevalence compared to adults, oGvHD with its morbidities is a concern after allo-HSCT in pediatric patients. Regular ophthalmologic assessments following allo-HSCT are therefore recommended for early detection and treatment of these potentially problematic complications in pediatric patients.

Ethics

Ethics committee approval number: 014/11 – IOP, 0269/10 Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Dr Lauro Augusto de Oliveira for his invaluable patience and feedback. I could not have undertaken this journey without the generous support of the Pediatric Oncology Institute – GRAAC – Federal University of São Paulo, especially from medical and nursing staff and of all the study participants involved in this project.

References
[1]
H. Shikari, F. Amparo, U. Saboo, R. Dana.
Onset of ocular graft-versus-host disease symptoms after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
[2]
Y. Rapoport, T. Freeman, T. Koyama, B.G. Engelhardt, M. Jagasia, B.N. Savani, et al.
Validation of international chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) group diagnostic criteria as a chronic ocular GvHD-specific metric.
[3]
R. Khan, S. Nair, T. Seth, P. Mishra, M. Mahapatra, T. Agarwal, et al.
Ocular graft versus host disease in allogeneic haematopoetic stem cell transplantation in a tertiary care centre in India.
Indian J Med Res, 142 (2015), pp. 543-548
[4]
D. Przepiorka, P. Anderlini, R. Saliba, K. Cleary, R. Mehra, I. Khouri, et al.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation.
Blood, 98 (2001), pp. 1695-1700
[5]
K.S. Na, Y.S. Yoo, J.W. Mok, J.W. Lee, C.K. Joo.
Incidence and risk factors for ocular GvHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant, 50 (2015), pp. 1459-1464
[6]
J.C. Wang, J.C. Teichman, M. Mustafa, H. O'Donnell, R. Broady, S.N Yeung.
Risk factors for the development of ocular graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) dry eye syndrome in patients with chronic GvHD.
Br J Ophthalmol, 99 (2015), pp. 1514-1518
[7]
A.H. Filipovich, D. Weisdorf, S. Pavletic, G. Socie, J.R. Wingard, S.J. Lee, et al.
National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 11 (2005), pp. 945-956
[8]
M.H. Jagasia, H.T. Greinix, M. Arora, et al.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. the 2014 diagnosis and staging working group report.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 21 (2015),
[9]
H. Shikari, J.H. Antin, R. Dana.
Ocular graft-versus-host disease: a review.
Surv Ophthalmol, 58 (2013), pp. 233-251
[10]
M. Hessen, E.K. Akpek.
Ocular graft-versus-host disease.
Curr Opin Allerg Clin Immunol, 12 (2012), pp. 540-547
[11]
Y.S. Bradfield, B.J. Kushner, R.E Gangnon.
Ocular complications after organ and bone marrow transplantation in children.
J AAPOS, 9 (2005), pp. 426-432
[12]
Y.C. Sun, X. Chai, Y. Inamoto, J. Pidala, P.J. Martin, M.E. Flowers, et al.
Impact of chronic graft-versus-host disease on quality of life.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 21 (2015), pp. 1687-1691
[13]
M.E. Flowers, Y. Inamoto, P.A. Carpenter, S.J. Lee, H.P. Kiem, E.W. Petersdorf, et al.
Comparative analysis of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease and for chronic graft-versus-host disease according to National Institutes of Health consensus criteria.
Blood, 117 (2011), pp. 3214-3219
[14]
M. Kondo, S. Kojima, K. Horibe, K. Kato, T. Matsuyama.
Risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children.
Bone Marrow Transplant, 27 (2001), pp. 727-730
[15]
K. Atkinson, M.M. Horowitz, R.P. Gale, D.W. van Bekkum, E. Gluckman, R.A. Good, et al.
Risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation.
Blood, 75 (1990), pp. 2459-2464
[16]
L.A. Ochs, W.J. Miller, A.H. Filipovich, R.J. Haake, P.B. McGlave, B.R. Blazar, et al.
Predictive factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease after histocompatible sibling donor bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant, 13 (1994), pp. 455-460
[17]
S. Carlens, O. Ringdén, M. Remberger, B. Lönnqvist, H. Hägglund, S. Klaesson, et al.
Risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective single centre analysis.
Bone Marrow Transplant, 22 (1998), pp. 755-761
[18]
F. Locatelli, C. Uderzo, G. Dini, M. Zecca, W. Arcese, C. Messina, et al.
Graft-versus-host disease in children: the AIEOP-BMT Group experience with cyclosporine A.
Bone Marrow Transplant, 12 (1993), pp. 627-633
[19]
M.D. Eisner, C.S. August.
Impact of donor and recipient characteristics on the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease following pediatric bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant, 15 (1995), pp. 663-668
[20]
K.T. Fahnehjelm, A.L. Tornquist, J. Winiarski.
Dry-eye syndrome after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in children.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 86 (2008), pp. 253-258
[21]
Suh D.W., Ruttum M.S., Stuckenschneider B.J., Mieler W.F., Kivlin J.D. Ocular findings after bone marrow transplantation in a pediatric population. Ophthalmology.106:1564–70.
[22]
J.S. Ng, D.S. Lam, C.K. Li, K.W. Chik, G.P. Cheng, P.M. Yuen, et al.
Ocular complications of pediatric bone marrow transplantation.
Ophthalmology, 106 (1999), pp. 160-164
[23]
Dana, R., Jager, M. and Kim, S. (2013). eyenet. [online] pp.29-31. Available at: https://www.aao.org/eyenet/article/ocular-graftvshost-disease-downside-of-success-2 [Accessed 25 Jul. 2019].
[24]
K. Baird, K. Cooke, K.R. Schultz.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in children.
Pediatr Clin North Am, 57 (2010), pp. 297-322
[25]
S.J. Lee, D. Wolff, C. Kitko, J. Koreth, Y. Inamoto, M. Jagasia, M.L. Turner, et al.
Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 21 (2015), pp. 984-999
[26]
M. Zecca, A. Prete, R. Rondelli, et al.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease in children: incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome.
Blood, 100 (2002), pp. 1192-1200
[27]
Y. Ogawa, S.K. Kim, R. Dana, et al.
International Chronic Ocular Graft-vs-Host-Disease (GvHD) Consensus Group: proposed diagnostic criteria for chronic GvHD (Part I).
Sci Rep, 3 (2013), pp. 3419
Download PDF
Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Article options
Tools