The natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), both Philadelphia-chromosome positive – [chronic myeloid leukemia(CML)] and negative – [essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF)] has been well documented but the mechanism underlying the apparently inexorable progression from an initial, rather indolent or chronic phase (CP) to advance phase, a term including accelerated phase (AP) and blast crisis (BC) remains obscure. Most patients with MPNs present in the indolent phase, during which myeloid progenitor numbers are greatly increased in the bone marrow and blood. This phase may continue for as little as one year or as long as 20 years or more, but eventually it transforms into acute leukaemia (BC), in which an increasing proportion of blast cells are found in the marrow and peripheral blood. The risk associated with the development of advanced-phase disease differs depending on the MPN subtype and is influenced by a number of factors such as duration of disease, clinical factors, the presence of unique molecular genetic features, and in some cases, the therapeutic interventions. ET probably carries the lowest rate of transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), whereas MF may carry a relatively high risk; lymphoid transformation has been reported in rare cases. The risk of transformation in CML to BC in the ABL1-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) era appears to be quite low, <2% per annum. Transformed disease in general tends to be difficult to be managed and is associated with a poor prognosis. The best treatment strategy, therefore, remains the prevention of transformation. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the only treatment that has been observed to confer long-term benefit to a small minority of patients who qualify for it. In this presentation, I will address the evolving genetic landscape, translational research efforts and investigational therapies for transformed MPNs.
The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years.
© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2025
SRJ is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
See moreSNIP measures contextual citation impact by wighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
See more