Journal Information
Vol. 42. Issue S2.
Pages 12-13 (November 2020)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 42. Issue S2.
Pages 12-13 (November 2020)
20
DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.10.021
Open Access
RESULTS OF THE PEGASUS PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED TRIAL DEMONSTRATING SUPERIORITY OF THE C3 INHIBITOR PEGCETACOPLAN COMPARED TO ECULIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PAROXYSMAL NOCTURNAL HEMOGLOBINURIA
Visits
...
H. Weitza, P. Hillmenb, J. Szerc, A. Röthd, B. Höchsmanne, J. Pansef,g, K. Usukih, M. Griffinb, J. Kiladjianh, C. Decastroi, H. Nishimorij, L. Tank, M. Hamdanil, P. Deschateletsl, C. Francoisl, F. Grossil, A. Risitanom, R.P. Latourn
a Jane Anne Nohl Division of Hematology, Keck-USC School of Medicine, Los Angeles, United States
b Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
c Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
d Department of Hematology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
e Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University of Ulm and Institute of Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service and University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
f Department of Oncology, Hematology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
g NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
h Centre d’Investigations Cliniques, Hôpital Saint-Louis; Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris; Université de Paris, Paris, France
i Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
j Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
k Lisa Tan Pharma Consulting Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom
l Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, United States
m Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
n French Reference Center for Aplastic Anemia and Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Article information
Full Text

Objectives: Anemia persists in up to 72% of patients (pts) with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) despite the inhibition of C5 complement protein with eculizumab (ECU). Pegcetacoplan, a targeted C3 inhibitor, has the potential to control both intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and extravascular hemolysis (EVH). PEGASUS, a phase 3, randomized, open-label, controlled trial (NCT03500549), assessed efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan compared to ECU. Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 years with PNH and hemoglobin <10.5g/dL (despite ≥ 3 months of ECU therapy) completed a 4-week run-in with pegcetacoplan plus ECU before 1:1 randomization to monotherapy with pegcetacoplan (n=41) or ECU (n=39). Primary endpoint: change in hemoglobin level from baseline (start of run-in period) to week 16. Secondary endpoints: hemoglobin normalization (defined as hemoglobin level ≥lower limit of normal range) in the absence of transfusions, transfusion avoidance, absolute reticulocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-fatigue (FACIT-f) score, and adverse events (AEs). Hierarchical significance testing for secondary efficacy endpoints was gated on the success of the primary efficacy endpoint. Post hoc analyses included hemoglobin stabilization (defined as avoidance of a >1g/dL decrease from baseline) in the absence of transfusions. Results: Pegcetacoplan was superior to ECU for change in hemoglobin level at week 16, with an adjusted treatment difference of 3.84g/dL (p<0.0001). At week 16, a greater proportion of pts receiving pegcetacoplan achieved ≥ 2g/dL improvement in hemoglobin (61% vs 0%), hemoglobin normalization (34% vs 0%), and hemoglobin stabilization (85% vs 15%) in the absence of transfusion as compared with ECU. Non-inferiority was shown for transfusion avoidance (35/41 [85.4%] pegcetacoplan pts vs 6/39 [15.4%] ECU pts) and reticulocyte count, but not for LDH. FACIT-f score increased with pegcetacoplan (9.2 [1.61]) and decreased with ECU (-2.7 [2.82]), but was not tested for non-inferiority due to prespecified hierarchical testing. AEs occurred in 36/41 (87.8%) pts with pegcetacoplan and 34/39 (87.2%) pts with ECU; 7/41 (17.1%) and 6/39 (15.4%), respectively, had serious AEs. Most AEs were mild. AEs included injection site reactions (pegcetacoplan, 15/41 [36.6%]; ECU, 1/39 [2.6%] pts) and diarrhea (pegcetacoplan, 9/41 [22.0%]; ECU, 1/39 [2.6%]); infections were reported in 12/41 (29.3%) and 10/39 (25.6%) pts, respectively. Breakthrough hemolysis was reported in 4/41 (9.8%) pegcetacoplan pts and 9/39 (23.1%) ECU pts, leading to discontinuation in 3 pegcetacoplan pts. Discussion: In this phase 3 trial in pts with PNH, pegcetacoplan demonstrated superiority to ECU in hemoglobin level at week 16 with improved clinical outcomes including transfusion avoidance in most pts. The safety profile of pegcetacoplan was comparable to that of ECU. Conclusion: The efficacy of pegcetacoplan validates the prevention of extravascular as well as intravascular hemolysis in PNH, leading to a potential new therapeutic option. Funding: Apellis Pharmaceuticals.

Idiomas
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools